Jump to content

Recommended Posts

How come those streetspace sites are so skewed to leaving positive comments?


Following the experimental road closures, what is working well at this location?


That's a bit of a leading question. Why isn't there one that says:


Following the experimental road closures, what is not working well at this location.


These council websites are so skewed towards the narrative they want to deliver.

This on Southwark Cyclists.....


'The closure of Peckham Rye to cars should extend all the way from Peckham Rye up through Rye Lane so that it's possible to get from Peckham High Street to Peckham Rye Park via Rye Lane without encountering cars.'


.....is precisely the problem with single issue lobby groups.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This on Southwark Cyclists.....

>

> 'The closure of Peckham Rye to cars should extend

> all the way from Peckham Rye up through Rye Lane

> so that it's possible to get from Peckham High

> Street to Peckham Rye Park via Rye Lane without

> encountering cars.'

>

> .....is precisely the problem with single issue

> lobby groups.


Half expected this as it's the way we are headed - seems to be roadworks on the bit of Rye Lane that's open every day - maybe they'll make them permanent. is something down there ? I think outside my flat is Quatermass and the pit.

There needs to be a legal challenge by means of a Judicial Review. I have obtained legal advice which confirms that in order to legally enforceable the roadblocks, there needs to be a second order under section 9 and 10 of the Road Traffic Act 1984.


Furthermore, the 15 October 2020 order experimental orders under sections 9, 10 and 63 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 can be challengeable within six weeks. In the the first instance a pre-action protocol letter would need to be served on the council.

I took advice, you can do this - it will cost you to send a letter as first course of action, it will get them to pay attention - but may not do much more - anything beyond that could get very expensive - but you have time to do it.


I will PM you with a local solicitor's details who has experience in these matters. He gave me some good advice but we sadly didn't have time on our side.

Is this something One Dulwich might do?


jazzhino Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There needs to be a legal challenge by means of a

> Judicial Review. I have obtained legal advice

> which confirms that in order to legally

> enforceable the roadblocks, there needs to be a

> second order under section 9 and 10 of the Road

> Traffic Act 1984.

>

> Furthermore, the 15 October 2020 order

> experimental orders under sections 9, 10 and 63 of

> the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 can be

> challengeable within six weeks. In the the first

> instance a pre-action protocol letter would need

> to be served on the council.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello.   Thanks Nigel and Hparker 😀   I've got new slots available for new students looking for a piano teacher or guitar teacher.   You could start in the new term beginning September, or I'm also available adhoc-styles through the summer holidays at times.   I teach all ages, in most styles, in lots of different ways according to how you learn/like to learn.   Give me a call or text on 07730 402336.   I have connections to lots of performance opportunities/networks too.   I run regular events /student concerts, and play in bands/perform.   Natalie. 
    • So do I, but I think they are in trouble as well.  Anyway, that space wouldn't be big enough.
    • I'm not talking about Starmer. I was responding to a post which  said that  Corbyn was unelectable. How people voted in the "more hotly contested election" is irrelevant. Corbyn wasn't leading the Labour Party then. Starmer was. And the turnout for Labour reflects that. 
    • Reeves says she's in charge and no no's Rayners plan, what happens now?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...