Jump to content

Recommended Posts

One of my children has just been offered a place in the reception intake at The Villa (Camberwell) for next year. They have asked me to accept or decline by the end of the month, which is before assessments at the Dulwich Schools even take place.

Before I actually knew anything at all about schooling round here (ie before we applied for this our first child to go anywhere) I was very attracted to the idea of getting the kids into a school where they can stay put until 18, and choosing between schools basically by looking at their exit data for 18+ and working backwards from there. But then I toured The Villa, absolutely loved it and, among other things, became really sold on the idea of NOT making a long term committment to one place before my child has even learned to write. And so The Villa become my first choice. I am thinking of accepting and withdrawing our applications for the Dulwich Schools immediately.

Are there any parents out there who get the logic of this? And are there any Villa parents who can reassure me that I am not letting my heart rule my head, and that The Villa truly is as exceptional as I think it may be.

WMx

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/26904-the-villa/
Share on other sites

Dear WM,


I can't comment on the Villa at all I'm afraid, but as I understand it, the benefit of being in a school that does not go all the way through to 18, is that at the appropriate age, be it 7+, 10+,11+ or 13+ ( the various different entry points for prep and senior schools ) is that you can make a much more reasoned assessment of the type of school that is going to be right for your child. Which, as you rightly point out, you have very little idea about when they can't even read or write. For example, I moved my son at 10+ as he was ready for a bigger academic ( and sporting ) challenge than his twin sister. She appears to be a much later developer and her now emerging skills are more art and drama and she would not thrive in a hot house academic environment. Both these characteristics have only begun to appear in the last couple of years ( they are 11 now ). I have also decided to go down the single sex route rather than co -ed, but again, I would have not had any idea about that at the start of their education and had just automatically assumed that it would be co-ed.

As other threads have suggested on similar topics, every child is different in terms of their developmental ability . At the end of the day, you will have a gut feel about what suits your child and your family best.

SJx

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/26904-the-villa/#findComment-594483
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While they struggle with economics of UK plc, collectively we all suffer as a result of their ineptitude. 
    • I’ve tried to find details of surgeries being held before but not found any. The section of the Southwark website that details councillors’ surgeries says that: Your locally elected Councillors will be holding a roving surgery programme in the Dulwich Hill area to enable residents to raise any local issues. Residents will be notified by letter in advance of the date, time and specific streets/roads where the surgery will take place.  Surgeries are not held in August, on Bank Holidays, Easter or in Christmas Week.  Dulwich Hill Ward Councillors I’ve never seen any notification of surgeries being held, including on the DH councillors’ social media accounts. I don’t know if any other residents of Dulwich Hill have? Neighbouring wards all seem to have times and places posted for surgeries.   
    • I wouldn't feel too bad about that. It's one of the few degree areas that you can do a BA or a BSc in, so it's a fairly wide-ranging and complex subject. Certainly Truss, Kwasi and Reeves seem to struggle with it.
    • I can't access the article - what's the gist?  I took the markets getting jittery when she was crying at PMQs to be a sign that they trusted her. But maybe it was because they were simply worried about any form of instability.  The NIC hikes have stymied the economy, which we could all see a mile off. Will a wealth tax improve things? Does anyone here think the trickle down has any impact and that chasing out the super rich will help things? Or are we just seeing off the biggest contributors to the economy? And has the Kwasi approach ever worked anywhere else?  Economics is not my strong point at all, I'd love to know others' opinions, but it seems to be she has few options, especially as the party is so divided. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...