Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Perhaps not the answer you want, but are you sure you want an agency? They cost a lot. Of course, it's worth paying for peace of mind. But in my experience agencies do not do as good a job of checking people out as you would yourself. Twice, when our nannies' times with us have ended, the nanny has enrolled with a nice, pukka, knightsbridge-based agency to find a new position. Each time, I was only asked for a reference by email: the agency never called me to verify who I was or what i'd written. whereas when i recruit a new nanny i check out referees very thoroughly and always speak on the phone with at least two recent employers. And whenever I've tried to use an agency to recruit, I've been very frustrated that they would keep sending me CVs of people who did not fit my criteria.

i would recommend using a very specialist website, like findababysitter.com (which is very good, but misnamed - it has sections for all domestic and child-caring jobs, not just babysitting) writing a very specific job description, and go from there. You will be fairly inundated with replies, but you just have to be ruthless in sifting the really good ones - I don't even reply to the rest. You may have to wait a few weeks before you get anyone you want to interview, but the last two times I've recruited this way I have only needed to interview one (perfect) candidate.

Just don't hang about. Jan is close.

You may have no luck with an agency supplying part time help in this area for the period you want anyway - especially if it's a live out post - so I would crack on and advertise on a website too, if I was you. You can always ignore the replies. It doesn't take long.

Like I say, an agency doesn't do it all for you anyway. They should for the price they charge but they really don't.


Ps. You could also advertise on the forum family classifieds page. If what you are after is someone just popping in three or four days/nights a week to tide you over the new born period, you are much more likely to get that from someone local than from a national agency.

When I was recruiting a live-in nanny earlier this year, I used Margaret at NannyLink, who was initially recommended to me by another family roomer. I also had good candidates from Abbeville Nannies and Nappy Valley Nannies (both Clapham-based but happy to recruit for Dulwich positions). I found it impossible to recruit for a live-in position directly. On the other hand, when I was looking for a live-out nanny, I found that recruiting myself was much easier - gumtree, this forum, and either simplychildcare or childcare.co.uk, can't remember which. Not sure on temp positions though. Good luck!
I used Nannylink this summer to find a part time nanny (now living further out of London so didn't really have any local networks to tap into like edf). I thought they were good - yes you pay but I liked that they forwarded me candidates within my budget and that the nannies had at least been through some sort of initial screening first. I have also used Nightnannies in the past for some sleep training for my then 12m old baby - just 3 nights - as you say I just couldn't face doing the searching myself!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...