Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Perhaps not the answer you want, but are you sure you want an agency? They cost a lot. Of course, it's worth paying for peace of mind. But in my experience agencies do not do as good a job of checking people out as you would yourself. Twice, when our nannies' times with us have ended, the nanny has enrolled with a nice, pukka, knightsbridge-based agency to find a new position. Each time, I was only asked for a reference by email: the agency never called me to verify who I was or what i'd written. whereas when i recruit a new nanny i check out referees very thoroughly and always speak on the phone with at least two recent employers. And whenever I've tried to use an agency to recruit, I've been very frustrated that they would keep sending me CVs of people who did not fit my criteria.

i would recommend using a very specialist website, like findababysitter.com (which is very good, but misnamed - it has sections for all domestic and child-caring jobs, not just babysitting) writing a very specific job description, and go from there. You will be fairly inundated with replies, but you just have to be ruthless in sifting the really good ones - I don't even reply to the rest. You may have to wait a few weeks before you get anyone you want to interview, but the last two times I've recruited this way I have only needed to interview one (perfect) candidate.

Just don't hang about. Jan is close.

You may have no luck with an agency supplying part time help in this area for the period you want anyway - especially if it's a live out post - so I would crack on and advertise on a website too, if I was you. You can always ignore the replies. It doesn't take long.

Like I say, an agency doesn't do it all for you anyway. They should for the price they charge but they really don't.


Ps. You could also advertise on the forum family classifieds page. If what you are after is someone just popping in three or four days/nights a week to tide you over the new born period, you are much more likely to get that from someone local than from a national agency.

When I was recruiting a live-in nanny earlier this year, I used Margaret at NannyLink, who was initially recommended to me by another family roomer. I also had good candidates from Abbeville Nannies and Nappy Valley Nannies (both Clapham-based but happy to recruit for Dulwich positions). I found it impossible to recruit for a live-in position directly. On the other hand, when I was looking for a live-out nanny, I found that recruiting myself was much easier - gumtree, this forum, and either simplychildcare or childcare.co.uk, can't remember which. Not sure on temp positions though. Good luck!
I used Nannylink this summer to find a part time nanny (now living further out of London so didn't really have any local networks to tap into like edf). I thought they were good - yes you pay but I liked that they forwarded me candidates within my budget and that the nannies had at least been through some sort of initial screening first. I have also used Nightnannies in the past for some sleep training for my then 12m old baby - just 3 nights - as you say I just couldn't face doing the searching myself!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...