Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sorry nx. Let?s try again


https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2020/07/23/conservative-party-members-stand-boris-would-vote-


Nope. That doesn?t work either. But if I manually paste link to a browser it does


Anyway. Try Googling ?yougov party members Boris?

I found a yougov page that said 3/4 of general Tory membership supported Boris aeons ago but I?m not sure of the point you?re trying to make? General Tory membership do not participate in any vote of confidence and do not draw up any shortlist of two for a new Tory Leader. The general Tory membership I?m sure did not want to see Thatcher ousted but ousted she was (hurrah).


ETA Anyway, thinking about it further, Cummings walking out of no. 10 with a box supposedly containing his belongings was just a very public way of announcing he is now available for new employment and I?m afraid he?ll be receiving a lot of offers, hopefully outside of government.

Oh my

Are we all failing to see the obvious


Tonight "I'm a celebrity" starts and as well as the 10 famous ? people in a Welsh castle, they also need a pantomime villain to give the audience someone to Boo


Of course I could be wrong but "he's behind you ..."

I'm trying to educate myself: can anyone help? Apart from a string of motifs for t-shirts and kids' phone cases, ...


"Timber Tots promotes children's imagination and interaction

Collect the Squirrel family: The Nut-Nuts!

Include the 4 characters from the Nut-Nut family"


looks like a possible source. Is that likely?


And while I'm here, on my way there I found myself traversing the Mail Online and some lime-green nipple tape. I hadn't realised it came in different colours. Do they signify, or is it simply a personal choice-of-the-day sort of thing?

Meanwhile this greedy piece of hypocrisy is making people on minimum wage pay for the meals of kids whose parents obviously couldn't afford to have them in the first place! As well as depriving several families from purchasing their own homes. Bravo the Daily Mail who actually received criticism for printing the article...


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8949391/Campaigning-football-star-Marcus-Rashford-bought-five-luxury-homes-worth-2million.html

The criticism is more about the cack-handed and obvious briefing against Marcus Rashford by this government who would rather blame him for making them look bad and forcing them into a U-turn than their own unwillingness to engage in the issue of meals outside term time when it first came up.


Someone mentioned to me that this was coming (the anti-Rashford briefings) last week and I thought "they wouldn't be so stupid, would they?". Turns out they would.

I did see that he has patented his name in the States, allowing him to use his brand for such thing as 'grooming products' - it all looks rather nefarious to me....


Sorry just using this to show how ludicrous the DM/DH article is. I'm sure we are all aware that grooming products refers to hair and face care.

Boris has gone back into isolation in No10 now it seems after not wearing a mask when meeting an MP (Kay Burley said "Oh Dear" when Hancock suggested they don't wear masks in No10).


Who's going to be the leader without Cummings and Cain. Maybe Allegra Stratton and Carrie Symonds will run the show - they seemed to be the opposition to Cain and Cummings laddish culture..

Since our resident racist doesn't understand the meaning of hypocrisy, here's an example from the same newspaper, another article about a wealthy young footballer doing the sensible and right thing and buying property to protect his and his family's future. The difference being this is portrayed as a positive thing whereas Rashford's isn't. I wonder why?...


Em3vNTTW4AIxB4y?format=jpg&name=small


Yet more hypocrisy, the same newspaper has run positive articles on another, now retired, footballer, Robbie Fowler, who has built up a property empire to such an extent he ended up in the top 100 Rich List, and runs courses at circa ?1k a head to learn how he did it. Clue, he's a wealthy ex-footballer.


A reminder, Jonathan Harmsworth, 4th Viscount Rothermere and billionaire owner of The Daily Mail, pays no UK tax whatsoever because he channels his money through offshore accounts. Here's one of his weekend boltholes...


Em4YepDXcAA2d-3?format=jpg&name=small

ianr Wrote:


>

> And while I'm here, on my way there I found myself

> traversing the Mail Online and some lime-green

> nipple tape. I hadn't realised it came in

> different colours. Do they signify, or is it

> simply a personal choice-of-the-day sort of thing?



Crikey, ianr, many reasons to keep away from the Mail, but are they actually recommending this tape ??!!

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

here's an example from the same newspaper, another article about a wealthy young footballer doing the sensible and right thing and buying property to protect his and his....


In deed, and another selfish young non-specific ethnicity footballer (Tosin Adarabioyo) daring to buy a home. Not sure why they didn't put him in digs with a nice landlady/lord


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5253633/Man-City-footballer-20-25k-week-buys-market-2-25m-home.html


I'll not look any further as it is too easy to expose the DH. Although nipple tapes do sound exciting.

That Phil Foden article was used by Raheem Sterling to highlight how differently the Mail portrayed him and Foden both buying their Mum an expensive house. Foden was portrayed positively, while Sterling was portrayed negatively. Both wealthy young footballers who could afford to do it, only difference being their ethnicity. I'll give the Mail the benefit of the doubt (yeah, I know) that their criticism of Rashford wasn't based on ehnicity, but there's no disputing that articles like that knowingly send a dogwhistle to racists to spout their bile, as witnessed above...

Uncleglen - how come you didn't slag-off the rich white football players buying expensive homes at ?2m EACH, not 'five for ?1.5m' ?!

You'll not have the spine to answer this, so let's just leave the question hanging there...


diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That Phil Foden article was used by Raheem

> Sterling to highlight how differently the Mail

> portrayed him and Foden both buying their Mum an

> expensive house. Foden was portrayed positively,

> while Sterling was portrayed negatively. Both

> wealthy young footballers who could afford to do

> it, only difference being their ethnicity. I'll

> give the Mail the benefit of the doubt (yeah, I

> know) that their criticism of Rashford wasn't

> based on ehnicity, but there's no disputing that

> articles like that knowingly send a dogwhistle to

> racists to spout their bile, as witnessed above...

Sorry to digress again from Cummings but...


How much does it actually cost to feed a kid with a daily lunch by the way? I'm guessing it can't be much. I'm alright with forking out some loose change day to day but what confuses me is how large companies (eg. techs) can enjoy profiting from our infrastructure, paid for by we the people and for generations, without them helping out more on stuff like school meals. Have I misinterpreted the situation? I am I becoming a leftie? Or is it just logic...


I just find it amazing that a few very wealthy people, sometimes based here and usually based everywhere, have become so much more wealthy in 2020 (and because of 2020) and yet we can't give all the kids a bit of simple food. Just seems nuts. And in the long term don't the big corps want healthy customers with a bit of disposable to keep the exchanges going in the future?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I've never got Christmas pudding. The only times I've managed to make it vaguely acceptable to people is thus: Buy a really tiny one when it's remaindered in Tesco's. They confound carbon dating, so the yellow labelled stuff at 75% off on Boxing Day will keep you going for years. Chop it up and soak it in Stones Ginger Wine and left over Scotch. Mix it in with a decent vanilla ice cream. It's like a festive Rum 'n' Raisin. Or: Stick a couple in a demijohn of Aldi vodka and serve it to guests, accompanied by 'The Party's Over' by Johnny Mathis when people simply won't leave your flat.
    • Not miserable at all! I feel the same and also want to complain to the council but not sure who or where best to aim it at? I have flagged it with our local MP and one Southwark councillor previously but only verbally when discussing other things and didn’t get anywhere other than them agreeing it was very frustrating etc. but would love to do something on paper. I think they’ve been pretty much every night for the last couple of weeks and my cat is hating it! As am I !
    • That is also a Young's pub, like The Cherry Tree. However fantastic the menu looks, you might want to ask exactly who will cook the food on the day, and how. Also, if  there is Christmas pudding on the menu, you might want to ask how that will be cooked, and whether it will look and/or taste anything like the Christmas puddings you have had in the past.
    • This reminds me of a situation a few years ago when a mate's Dad was coming down and fancied Franklin's for Christmas Day. He'd been there once, in September, and loved it. Obviously, they're far too tuned in to do it, so having looked around, £100 per head was pretty standard for fairly average pubs around here. That is ridiculous. I'd go with Penguin's idea; one of the best Christmas Day lunches I've ever had was at the Lahore Kebab House in Whitechapel. And it was BYO. After a couple of Guinness outside Franklin's, we decided £100 for four people was the absolute maximum, but it had to be done in the style of Franklin's and sourced within walking distance of The Gowlett. All the supermarkets knock themselves out on veg as a loss leader - particularly anything festive - and the Afghani lads on Rye Lane are brilliant for more esoteric stuff and spices, so it really doesn't need to be pricey. Here's what we came up with. It was considerably less than £100 for four. Bread & Butter (Lidl & Lurpak on offer at Iceland) Mersea Oysters (Sopers) Parsnip & Potato Soup ( I think they were both less than 20 pence a kilo at Morrisons) Smoked mackerel, Jerseys, watercress & radish (Sopers) Rolled turkey breast joint (£7.95 from Iceland) Roast Duck (two for £12 at Lidl) Mash  Carrots, star anise, butter emulsion. Stir-fried Brussels, bacon, chestnuts and Worcestershire sauce.(Lidl) Clementine and limoncello granita (all from Lidl) Stollen (Lidl) Stichelton, Cornish Cruncher, Stinking Bishop. (Marks & Sparks) There was a couple of lessons to learn: Don't freeze mash. It breaks down the cellular structure and ends up more like a French pomme purée. I renamed it 'Pomme Mikael Silvestre' after my favourite French centre-half cum left back and got away with it, but if you're not amongst football fans you may not be so lucky. Tasted great, looked like shit. Don't take the clementine granita out of the freezer too early, particularly if you've overdone it on the limoncello. It melts quickly and someone will suggest snorting it. The sugar really sticks your nostrils together on Boxing Day. Speaking of 'lost' Christmases past, John Lewis have hijacked Alison Limerick's 'Where Love Lives' for their new advert. Bastards. But not a bad ad.   Beansprout, I have a massive steel pot I bought from a Nigerian place on Choumert Road many years ago. It could do with a work out. I'm quite prepared to make a huge, spicy parsnip soup for anyone who fancies it and a few carols.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...