Jump to content

Recommended Posts

No it was sent to me as a link and I was taken aback that the sender felt it would strike a chord. I left it without comment to see what others thought. About the only thing I agree with is that much of the debate is wrong headed and pointless.


The various issues / incidents / events that led to the Levenson report were illegal and improper under existing laws. The orchestrated campaign to establish a "statutory regulation" to under pin a stronger self regulatory regime might have some, minimal, impact but I don't see it persuading the press to eschew illegality any more post its introduction than before.


I don't like the idea of statutory legislation - however minimal. It does imply some form of licensing by government which I would abhor.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So does that mean they know who was responsible for that violent attack on the chap in the Rye park?
    • It should be easy enough to point out to anyone even thinking of voting reform that should they take power they will have no impact. And will make things worse.  And if people think politicians break promises now and reform are a breath of fresh air then they ain’t seen nothing yet  but they won’t really care about immigration if reform do win  uk used to be about law and order and now we have dim talking heads everywhere unchallenged going “leave the ECHR, stuff the judges, just do it!!”   like life is that simple sweeties 
    • I have been reliably informed that it's not the same group. 
    • my bet is it's the same group and no amount of talking to is going to make a difference. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...