Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Charlotte W - I object to my comments being referred to as "witticisms" !


I was not trying to be funny at all. My points were serious - as serious as they could possibly be, given what you'd written.


You were proposing that people who've made a Billion should be despised.

But with no other reason given than they have more money than you.

So half a Billion and they're in the clear from our hatred ? If they just get HALF a Billion do we, you know, sort of half-hate them ?


Your premise seems weak and unjust. Perhaps like a 15yr old's idealistic view.


Most Billionaires I'm sure have worked at it.


Mainly you get what you work for.


If you're peeved that you're not richer, there may still be time for you to climb the ladder and make something of yourself. Then you can give it all away as you've suggested you would.


But, I was NOT being "witty" !

LOZ

I thought ?money/assets? your words, were wealth which is why I used the word in my response to your original post. If we can send men to the moon, put up satellites to spy on people and build the internet, I don't think it is beyond our ability to find a way to divide up the world's wealth. Unlike you I don't believe that if the world's wealth was distributed equally things would be in 10 years? time roughly the same as they are now. The reason is that many people who suddenly come into a fortune one of the first things they do is buy a home. They may then proceed to buy a car, go on holiday or go travelling, pay for a higher education etc. If everyone received ?30,000 that would give most people the opportunity to buy their own home and what is wrong with that? While ?30,000 may be a considerable sum it is not going to last a lifetime so people would still have to work.



So how would you define wealth then, if not money/assets?


So you think that it is quite possible for someone to think up a way to divide the world's assets evenly, but have no real ideas on how to do it yourself? Nor any thought about the problems such an approach would hit?


You've not really thought this one through, have you?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Wow I had no idea they give you 5% in perfume for your accommodation. You're right, I need to travel more. 
    • Do none of you go abroad.  Tourist taxes are really common in continental Europe and do vary a lot city by city. They are collected by the hotels/rental apartments. They are usually a  tiny part of your holiday costs.  In Narbonne recently we paid €1.30 per person per night.  The next town we went to charge 80 cents per person per night. By comparison Cologne is 5% of your accomodation.
    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...