Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"DaveR, the primary engine for overblown Greek debt wasn't the Euro, but that it quite simply lied on it's self-certified credit assessment.


In 2009 the new government announced debt was 12.9% of GDP, not the 3.6% the previous government bad claimed. In other words it had persistently deceived banks about its ability to manage debt (and the size of that debt). It was this deception that created the crisis - date quite clearly to October 2009 - not the low interest rates achievable with the Euro.


It was immaterial what currency that deception was played out in.


People are trying to rewrite history to claim the single currency was at fault. It wasn't.


In the aftermath the single currency certainly made it impossible to devalue - a strategy that would have been used historically to manage the situation (but then devaluation is financial nuclear war anyway, so the Greeks would have been no better off).


It also made it more difficult to balance the economy internally by manipulating exchange rates to drive internal productivity."


I'm afraid you're just wrong. It was the 2009 budget deficit that was revised upwards from 3% to 12% (and ultimately 15%). Debt was already running at over 100% of GDP. Greece had borrowed steadily throughout the 80s and 90s but had also experienced a series of devaluations, including in 98, just prior to joining the euro. It was well known in 98 that Greece had not met the criteria for euro membership (either debt or deficit) and it was subsequently well known that the SGP requirements were not enforced. Of course the Greek governments lied about debt and deficit levels, but the reason nobody cared and kept lending was essentially because they were buying euro denominated bonds, rather than drachma.

Isla, my first post was hardly 'taunting' was it?


That would be silly hyperbole on what was never more than a wry aside.


By making such an exaggerated claim, it's you that's polarising the debate and fuelling the flames of 'unpleasant stuff'.


I don't know what you mean by 'not paying off the loan' - a debt write off is the same thing (often referred as 'taking a haircut') and that has already happened once, and probably will do again.


Whether the Greeks will be in the same place in 10 years time is entirely up to them, not the common currency. They will need to balance the books between government income and expenditure.

DaveR, apologies for the careless short hand regarding the term 'debt', I think it's persistently clear in the thread that I'm referring to the ability of the Greek government to balance its incomings and outgoings (in other words budget deficit).


I totally agree with you that investors were more confident in the Euro than the Drachma - investors built misguided confidence that they were no longer risking devaluation as a form of managed default.


As they discovered, avoiding devaluation was no better guarantee against default in Greece than simply checking whether the nation was credit worthy. It wasn't.


The fault doesn't lie with the Euro for this: the Greek government deceived greedy investors.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I wonder whether his political epiphany and renaissance will stretch to him using his real name - James Ashworth-McLintock - rather than the more proletarian 'McAsh'. To my mind, the only people who should have self-bestowed mononyms are very talented Brazilian footballers - Pele, Kaka, Ronaldinho - very talented female pop icons - Madonna, Shakira, Sonia - or Russian revolutionaries - Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky. Sonia's greatest hits compilation, 'Greatest Hits', is out now on vinyl & CD through PWL Recordings.
    • Probably more helpful to ask simply whether McCash was affiliated with the Greens before becoming a Labour councillor. Trying to explain your thought process and unravel your fevered imagination (particularly when it comes to local politica) is the kind of thing that might require several years of psychoanalysis.
    • made the mistake of going to megans twice in DV.. would never make that mistake a 3rd time. Ditto I liked Romeo Jones a lot they did lovely soups and sandwiches and coffee too and such loveley staff.
    • Aren't most marxists radical by default...and he was a self proclaimed marxist on his twitter feed for years but deleted it as I suspect it did not sit well at Labour HQ. The big worry for Labour might be that he takes votes away from them (but not enough for him to win a seat) especially as there may be a significant protest vote against them at the national level as they are making such a pig's ear of things. I suspect though Labour are glad to see the back of him - to say he was a thorn in their side is an understatement and his loss of the leadership of the council was clearly part of the purge Labour has been embarking on to rid itself of some of the far-left lunatic fringe that have blighted them for so long. The Greens of course are willingly take any disaffected far-left Labour rejects in the same way Reform are hovvering up the lunatic elements of the Tories. The fact he went in with both barrels on Labour is hardly surprisingly but wonderfully hypocritical of someone who thought they were about to lead a Labour council. My how politicians flip-flop to suit their own personal agenda. How long before he falls out with the Greens...where to then? Why do I think he had an affiliation with the Greens before he became a Labour councillor? Or did I imagine that?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...