Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is Mr Shelbrooke MP stupid? What matters more is how stupid he thinks we are. His proposal to restrict access to booze & fags for those receiving welfare benefits is insultingly worthless to achieve his stated end.


Make his proposal law, and, if If I'm on the jobseekers, and I want a drink or a smoke, all I'll have to do is buy half a dozen chicken legs for a friend, who will then buy me a bottle of own brand gin or a packet of twenty.


Also, how are shopkeepers to know who's on benefits unless we're all kitted out with ID cards that will let anyone and everyone know our employment status?


Or, if the unemployed are to be paid by giving them some kind of charge card, it will simply be another step towards the abolition of cash transactions.


Another point worth making is that being out of work or generally poor and on benefits is no fun. It's plain sadism to try blocking those on benefits from drowning their sorrows.


By all means, cut down on systematic fraud by largely foreign gangs and by those working inside the welfare system. Also, make it easier for people to get off welfare - by cutting taxes on low pay and cutting regulations on micro-businesses. But leave the genuinely helpless to enjoy the few pleasures that are still not illegal.

I'd not heard about this, but the whole putting added pressure on the unemployed in order to somehow convince them that getting a job would be a good idea is just ridiculous. Yes there are SOME people who will happily sign on, whilst earning off the book, and living quite well, but for the most part people are desperate to climb out of their situation.


The idea you outline put me in mind of Compulsory income management in Australia. Indigenous Australians treated like shit, not welcome in a lot of work places, turn to drink because life is so crap, and then get told the government are going to give you food vouchers instead of money.

To clarify - I generally take a libertarian stance. For a majority of EDF readers Libertarianism is roughly equivalent to a s wiggle eyed, right wing, carpet munching Europhobe.


I wanted to draw attention to the fact that my kind of libertarianism is the more nuanced and liberal kind that prefers small government with a minimum of state interference.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Never really saw libertarianism as a conservative ideal.

>

> I'm sure there are many overlapping objectivess which could make them uneasy bedfellows, but

> British conservatism is obsessed with natural order and hierarchy, authority and control.


But you could also quite easily argue that the left wing is also obsessed with authority and control, in fact more so. Which is why I argue that libertarianism transcends simple left/right politics.

As I've said, libertarianism is about freedom to behave as libertarians would like everyone too.

There's no sense of irony because they see as other behaviour as an aberration from the norm, therefore allowing it is the opposite of liberal behaviour it's specifically enabling perversion therefore against the freedom of those who wish to live free from aberration.

Funny really.


I consider myself a common or garden liberal, live and let live i say.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...