Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is Mr Shelbrooke MP stupid? What matters more is how stupid he thinks we are. His proposal to restrict access to booze & fags for those receiving welfare benefits is insultingly worthless to achieve his stated end.


Make his proposal law, and, if If I'm on the jobseekers, and I want a drink or a smoke, all I'll have to do is buy half a dozen chicken legs for a friend, who will then buy me a bottle of own brand gin or a packet of twenty.


Also, how are shopkeepers to know who's on benefits unless we're all kitted out with ID cards that will let anyone and everyone know our employment status?


Or, if the unemployed are to be paid by giving them some kind of charge card, it will simply be another step towards the abolition of cash transactions.


Another point worth making is that being out of work or generally poor and on benefits is no fun. It's plain sadism to try blocking those on benefits from drowning their sorrows.


By all means, cut down on systematic fraud by largely foreign gangs and by those working inside the welfare system. Also, make it easier for people to get off welfare - by cutting taxes on low pay and cutting regulations on micro-businesses. But leave the genuinely helpless to enjoy the few pleasures that are still not illegal.

I'd not heard about this, but the whole putting added pressure on the unemployed in order to somehow convince them that getting a job would be a good idea is just ridiculous. Yes there are SOME people who will happily sign on, whilst earning off the book, and living quite well, but for the most part people are desperate to climb out of their situation.


The idea you outline put me in mind of Compulsory income management in Australia. Indigenous Australians treated like shit, not welcome in a lot of work places, turn to drink because life is so crap, and then get told the government are going to give you food vouchers instead of money.

To clarify - I generally take a libertarian stance. For a majority of EDF readers Libertarianism is roughly equivalent to a s wiggle eyed, right wing, carpet munching Europhobe.


I wanted to draw attention to the fact that my kind of libertarianism is the more nuanced and liberal kind that prefers small government with a minimum of state interference.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Never really saw libertarianism as a conservative ideal.

>

> I'm sure there are many overlapping objectivess which could make them uneasy bedfellows, but

> British conservatism is obsessed with natural order and hierarchy, authority and control.


But you could also quite easily argue that the left wing is also obsessed with authority and control, in fact more so. Which is why I argue that libertarianism transcends simple left/right politics.

As I've said, libertarianism is about freedom to behave as libertarians would like everyone too.

There's no sense of irony because they see as other behaviour as an aberration from the norm, therefore allowing it is the opposite of liberal behaviour it's specifically enabling perversion therefore against the freedom of those who wish to live free from aberration.

Funny really.


I consider myself a common or garden liberal, live and let live i say.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Well I don't know, and nor do you. Sitting MPs change their parties.
    • The Greens are knocking on the door of Labour in a few wards, so yes, there is some voter swing in play from some local canvassing. Elected officials jumping ship is nothing new. Political careerism is also nothing new. On a local level, all candidates for election start as committed party political activists. That's how they get selected to stand. But politics is also a long game. Far better to stay and be part of any swing when it inevitably comes (as it always does), than to close the door altogether imo. I think James failing to become leader probably was the key factor in his decision, but leaving for another party effectively means there is no way back. Maybe he is going to work himself into the future leadership of the Greens instead. Time will tell.  Edited to add that while I can understand why former Labour supporters feel disillusioned with the current government (both local and national), it's important to remember how bad things were under the last one and the coalition before it. It's going to take time for any government to rebuild the economy and pay down the national debt.
    • Err, are you saying that the Greens are not a political rival to Labour? Funny how those convictions only come to light when many politicians don't get what they want....do you honestly think that Cllr McAsh would have defected had he been allowed to lead Southwark council? Absolutely 1000% not.
    • He's not acting according to his convictions though, he's acting entirely according to his own ambition and self interest.  I'd be very concerned if I was a parent of a child in the Primary School he teaches at. His new party advocate teaching primary school children how to use crack cocaine and heroin: https://metro.co.uk/2026/02/21/green-party-says-primary-school-children-should-be-taught-to-take-drugs-safely-27031825/   Anyway, I feel we will finally be well rid of him. I don't believe he will stand in this ward. He will have a much better chance of election in Nunhead and Queens Road.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...