Jump to content

Chargeback dispute with merchant - advice please


Jules-and-Boo

Recommended Posts

hi


I challenged a service using the banks chargeback process which gives the merchant the opportunity to challenge my claim. My claim ws upheld and I received my money back.


I am now getting calls from the merchant requesting I settle the amount.


Are they able to pursue this, even though I've already successfully challenged it through the chargeback scheme?


it's all a bit too stressful


thanks

JB

The below is advice to merchants, so unless you've got a refund from both the merchant and the scheme ( a double refund) - I'd just quote the below.


https://www.opayo.co.uk/blog/uncertain-times-chargebacks


"The final decision in favour of one party or the other, which is made by the card scheme rather than the issuer, cannot be challenged further, other than through the process of bringing the matter before a court."

It?ll cost the merchant to take you to court, Covid is delaying court schedules/processes significantly, let them waste their time and money bringing you to court.

You?ll produce the evidence of the card issuer backing you up and the magistrate will think the merchant is just a chancer and wasting court time.

I would wager.

> General ED issues / gossip


??


> You?ll produce the evidence of

> the card issuer backing you up


What might that prove?


In any case, do card issuers willingly release their documents?


> and the magistrate will think


It would be a County Court matter.


What is the loss that the merchant would be seeking to recover?

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> thanks JohnL

>

> oh, so they can go to court. In which case, what

> is the point of a chargeback? Unless the court

> would hold any value in it?



The point is you were able to recover your money without taking them to court, and putting the ball in their court to deal with. Given it costs ?70+ to make a claim in the courts, it?s unlikely they will bother especially given that the card scheme has already found in your favour.

?45.


Spoke to a legal colleague who said they can go through courts (as Ian said) so I?ve just paid it as really can?t deal with the stress and if they win I?d have to pay their fees too.


Also given there is an element of ambiguity

Well, it shouldn?t be Sue but it?s hard to take abusive phone calls while home schooling and also working.

I don?t think I?m wrong but have to balance the energy and effort and time it would take to dispute it against what else I could be doing.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...