Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is a vendor (indy owned, not chain) at liberty to refuse a refund and only offer a like-for-like exchange on faulty confectionary, such as chocolate, if it is returned shortly after purchase and almost intact? If it is the law that they can do so, is it mostly likely that they would choose to allow refund of such a low-cost item for good will reasons? (Ie. is that the prevailing convention.)
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/275222-faulty-food-confectionary/
Share on other sites

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One chunk (not eaten, but spat out, though I did

> not return that bit). Faulty - wrong choice of

> word but when I wrote it I couldn;t think of

> another.



So what was actually wrong with it? (I'm on tenterhooks here, OMG my life is so boring 🤣🤣🤣)

Ok - it was 70% Lindt that, though usually great, was this time dry, brittle, dusty, musty and wouldn't melt in the mouth. I will not tell you which shop it was but will say that the proprietor was high handed and unpleasant. S/he told me s/he never eats it, to which I suggested s/he ought to start so that s/he could realise what crap s/he was selling. I refused a replacement because I thought I could well get another naff one - the batch or subsequent storage could have been off, etc. which I thought was a rational approach.


I've written to Lindt and got an acknowledgement that my complaint is being handled.


NB - the expiry date was end of May this year.


Watch this space!

I once complained about some chocolates.


Unfortunately I left the "faulty" box of chocolates on my bed, and a friend's dog ate them 😂😂😂 plus some of the cardboard 😂😂😂


I did explain why I couldn't return them and luckily the manufacturer (can't remember who it was) found it amusing.


If memory serves, they sent me a load more chocolates and their best wishes to the "discerning dog".


I don't remember the dog being sick, but I don't think she can have felt very well 🤢

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ok - it was 70% Lindt that, though usually great,

> was this time dry, brittle, dusty, musty and

> wouldn't melt in the mouth. I will not tell you

> which shop it was but will say that the proprietor

> was high handed and unpleasant. S/he told me s/he

> never eats it, to which I suggested s/he ought to

> start so that s/he could realise what crap s/he

> was selling. I refused a replacement because I

> thought I could well get another naff one - the

> batch or subsequent storage could have been off,

> etc. which I thought was a rational approach.

>

> I've written to Lindt and got an acknowledgement

> that my complaint is being handled.

>

> NB - the expiry date was end of May this year.

>

> Watch this space!


I have also bought iffy Lindt chocolate at an independent store on LL. I contacted Lindt and they sent me some vouchers which were of greated value than what i had spent.

My old nan, bless her, had a habit of writing to various companies complaining of various faults.


All food related, usually confectionary.


As grandkids, we could never understand why there was a reliable supply of sweets and chocolates under her bed, but pre computerisation, I guess her shenanigans went under the radar!

I love boring! I live for it! So, to add to the mind-eating tedium I give you the next instalment. Get nice and comfy, Trolley! You know you are loveable and sweet and vulnerable under that sociopathic exterior! Fluffy bunny slippers on, Troll-ey? Good. Then I'll begin.


Lindt replied, saying it is likely to do with storage at too high a temperature so I will be getting a fiver in vouchers. (Not usable, alas, at Tesco and CoOp.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi, over the last few years, I have had a problems with my joint freeholder. For the last 15 years there has been roof leaks and we had some repairs done around 2016 but I got another leak a few years ago. Instead of ensuring the roof is watertight, the joint freeholder is trying to force me to pay for non-essential work in hallway (tiling, new door and repainting) which will come to approximately £3K. We keep going around in circles and I want to suggest a mediator again (ideally with a property solicitor). Key reason is joint freeholder is also solicitor, so needs to be someone who has expertise of leases. I have proposed a managing agent for maintenance for the building or a declaration of trust but they wont agree, so we are unable to move forward. We are just two flats in one house and trust has completely broken down. I think they are trying to make life so difficult that I sell, so they can do an extension. I love my flat but I am not in a situation where I can move. Can anyone suggest a mediator that can help us find some common ground? Any advice welcome and DM if you prefer. 
    • This problem has been going on since before Covid due to the closure of the Dulwich sorting office. The local MP Ellie Reeves is aware and has written to the Post Office. They give the same generic responses about 'temporary' staffing issues. Would encourage people to email Ellie Reeves. It's about time this was finally resolved!
    • Sorry to hear you are having issues. Fwiw, we received a regular letter this week. Maybe it's worth asking at the Dulwich delivery office (it's in West Dulwich, though. Their phone number is 03457740740) to see if there are aware of any issues in your particular area?  I've seen cases in the past were the a particular postie was sick and they didn't cover for them, they just let everything accumulate for a couple of days until the person was back.
    • Mal, it is related to this issue and if you scroll back a few pages you will see that Brockwell was brought up in relation to this (not by me I hasten to add). Do you not think it seems perfectly reasonable for people to be able to reference a neighbouring event - one that is having a number of challenges not too dissimilar to the ones Gala is having?     These sentences from the BrixtonBuzz article I linked seem very pertinent too:  The concern, they argue, is not just about permits, but about the Council’s repeated failure to follow proper planning processes and its habit of acting in the interests of commercial promoters rather than the local community.   And this: The group is now calling on residents to write to their local MP and councillors, accusing the Council of using legal mechanisms to avoid scrutiny.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...