Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is a vendor (indy owned, not chain) at liberty to refuse a refund and only offer a like-for-like exchange on faulty confectionary, such as chocolate, if it is returned shortly after purchase and almost intact? If it is the law that they can do so, is it mostly likely that they would choose to allow refund of such a low-cost item for good will reasons? (Ie. is that the prevailing convention.)
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/275222-faulty-food-confectionary/
Share on other sites

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One chunk (not eaten, but spat out, though I did

> not return that bit). Faulty - wrong choice of

> word but when I wrote it I couldn;t think of

> another.



So what was actually wrong with it? (I'm on tenterhooks here, OMG my life is so boring 🤣🤣🤣)

Ok - it was 70% Lindt that, though usually great, was this time dry, brittle, dusty, musty and wouldn't melt in the mouth. I will not tell you which shop it was but will say that the proprietor was high handed and unpleasant. S/he told me s/he never eats it, to which I suggested s/he ought to start so that s/he could realise what crap s/he was selling. I refused a replacement because I thought I could well get another naff one - the batch or subsequent storage could have been off, etc. which I thought was a rational approach.


I've written to Lindt and got an acknowledgement that my complaint is being handled.


NB - the expiry date was end of May this year.


Watch this space!

I once complained about some chocolates.


Unfortunately I left the "faulty" box of chocolates on my bed, and a friend's dog ate them 😂😂😂 plus some of the cardboard 😂😂😂


I did explain why I couldn't return them and luckily the manufacturer (can't remember who it was) found it amusing.


If memory serves, they sent me a load more chocolates and their best wishes to the "discerning dog".


I don't remember the dog being sick, but I don't think she can have felt very well 🤢

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ok - it was 70% Lindt that, though usually great,

> was this time dry, brittle, dusty, musty and

> wouldn't melt in the mouth. I will not tell you

> which shop it was but will say that the proprietor

> was high handed and unpleasant. S/he told me s/he

> never eats it, to which I suggested s/he ought to

> start so that s/he could realise what crap s/he

> was selling. I refused a replacement because I

> thought I could well get another naff one - the

> batch or subsequent storage could have been off,

> etc. which I thought was a rational approach.

>

> I've written to Lindt and got an acknowledgement

> that my complaint is being handled.

>

> NB - the expiry date was end of May this year.

>

> Watch this space!


I have also bought iffy Lindt chocolate at an independent store on LL. I contacted Lindt and they sent me some vouchers which were of greated value than what i had spent.

My old nan, bless her, had a habit of writing to various companies complaining of various faults.


All food related, usually confectionary.


As grandkids, we could never understand why there was a reliable supply of sweets and chocolates under her bed, but pre computerisation, I guess her shenanigans went under the radar!

I love boring! I live for it! So, to add to the mind-eating tedium I give you the next instalment. Get nice and comfy, Trolley! You know you are loveable and sweet and vulnerable under that sociopathic exterior! Fluffy bunny slippers on, Troll-ey? Good. Then I'll begin.


Lindt replied, saying it is likely to do with storage at too high a temperature so I will be getting a fiver in vouchers. (Not usable, alas, at Tesco and CoOp.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...