Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is a vendor (indy owned, not chain) at liberty to refuse a refund and only offer a like-for-like exchange on faulty confectionary, such as chocolate, if it is returned shortly after purchase and almost intact? If it is the law that they can do so, is it mostly likely that they would choose to allow refund of such a low-cost item for good will reasons? (Ie. is that the prevailing convention.)
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/275222-faulty-food-confectionary/
Share on other sites

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One chunk (not eaten, but spat out, though I did

> not return that bit). Faulty - wrong choice of

> word but when I wrote it I couldn;t think of

> another.



So what was actually wrong with it? (I'm on tenterhooks here, OMG my life is so boring 🤣🤣🤣)

Ok - it was 70% Lindt that, though usually great, was this time dry, brittle, dusty, musty and wouldn't melt in the mouth. I will not tell you which shop it was but will say that the proprietor was high handed and unpleasant. S/he told me s/he never eats it, to which I suggested s/he ought to start so that s/he could realise what crap s/he was selling. I refused a replacement because I thought I could well get another naff one - the batch or subsequent storage could have been off, etc. which I thought was a rational approach.


I've written to Lindt and got an acknowledgement that my complaint is being handled.


NB - the expiry date was end of May this year.


Watch this space!

I once complained about some chocolates.


Unfortunately I left the "faulty" box of chocolates on my bed, and a friend's dog ate them 😂😂😂 plus some of the cardboard 😂😂😂


I did explain why I couldn't return them and luckily the manufacturer (can't remember who it was) found it amusing.


If memory serves, they sent me a load more chocolates and their best wishes to the "discerning dog".


I don't remember the dog being sick, but I don't think she can have felt very well 🤢

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ok - it was 70% Lindt that, though usually great,

> was this time dry, brittle, dusty, musty and

> wouldn't melt in the mouth. I will not tell you

> which shop it was but will say that the proprietor

> was high handed and unpleasant. S/he told me s/he

> never eats it, to which I suggested s/he ought to

> start so that s/he could realise what crap s/he

> was selling. I refused a replacement because I

> thought I could well get another naff one - the

> batch or subsequent storage could have been off,

> etc. which I thought was a rational approach.

>

> I've written to Lindt and got an acknowledgement

> that my complaint is being handled.

>

> NB - the expiry date was end of May this year.

>

> Watch this space!


I have also bought iffy Lindt chocolate at an independent store on LL. I contacted Lindt and they sent me some vouchers which were of greated value than what i had spent.

My old nan, bless her, had a habit of writing to various companies complaining of various faults.


All food related, usually confectionary.


As grandkids, we could never understand why there was a reliable supply of sweets and chocolates under her bed, but pre computerisation, I guess her shenanigans went under the radar!

I love boring! I live for it! So, to add to the mind-eating tedium I give you the next instalment. Get nice and comfy, Trolley! You know you are loveable and sweet and vulnerable under that sociopathic exterior! Fluffy bunny slippers on, Troll-ey? Good. Then I'll begin.


Lindt replied, saying it is likely to do with storage at too high a temperature so I will be getting a fiver in vouchers. (Not usable, alas, at Tesco and CoOp.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...