Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is a vendor (indy owned, not chain) at liberty to refuse a refund and only offer a like-for-like exchange on faulty confectionary, such as chocolate, if it is returned shortly after purchase and almost intact? If it is the law that they can do so, is it mostly likely that they would choose to allow refund of such a low-cost item for good will reasons? (Ie. is that the prevailing convention.)
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/275222-faulty-food-confectionary/
Share on other sites

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One chunk (not eaten, but spat out, though I did

> not return that bit). Faulty - wrong choice of

> word but when I wrote it I couldn;t think of

> another.



So what was actually wrong with it? (I'm on tenterhooks here, OMG my life is so boring 🤣🤣🤣)

Ok - it was 70% Lindt that, though usually great, was this time dry, brittle, dusty, musty and wouldn't melt in the mouth. I will not tell you which shop it was but will say that the proprietor was high handed and unpleasant. S/he told me s/he never eats it, to which I suggested s/he ought to start so that s/he could realise what crap s/he was selling. I refused a replacement because I thought I could well get another naff one - the batch or subsequent storage could have been off, etc. which I thought was a rational approach.


I've written to Lindt and got an acknowledgement that my complaint is being handled.


NB - the expiry date was end of May this year.


Watch this space!

I once complained about some chocolates.


Unfortunately I left the "faulty" box of chocolates on my bed, and a friend's dog ate them 😂😂😂 plus some of the cardboard 😂😂😂


I did explain why I couldn't return them and luckily the manufacturer (can't remember who it was) found it amusing.


If memory serves, they sent me a load more chocolates and their best wishes to the "discerning dog".


I don't remember the dog being sick, but I don't think she can have felt very well 🤢

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ok - it was 70% Lindt that, though usually great,

> was this time dry, brittle, dusty, musty and

> wouldn't melt in the mouth. I will not tell you

> which shop it was but will say that the proprietor

> was high handed and unpleasant. S/he told me s/he

> never eats it, to which I suggested s/he ought to

> start so that s/he could realise what crap s/he

> was selling. I refused a replacement because I

> thought I could well get another naff one - the

> batch or subsequent storage could have been off,

> etc. which I thought was a rational approach.

>

> I've written to Lindt and got an acknowledgement

> that my complaint is being handled.

>

> NB - the expiry date was end of May this year.

>

> Watch this space!


I have also bought iffy Lindt chocolate at an independent store on LL. I contacted Lindt and they sent me some vouchers which were of greated value than what i had spent.

My old nan, bless her, had a habit of writing to various companies complaining of various faults.


All food related, usually confectionary.


As grandkids, we could never understand why there was a reliable supply of sweets and chocolates under her bed, but pre computerisation, I guess her shenanigans went under the radar!

I love boring! I live for it! So, to add to the mind-eating tedium I give you the next instalment. Get nice and comfy, Trolley! You know you are loveable and sweet and vulnerable under that sociopathic exterior! Fluffy bunny slippers on, Troll-ey? Good. Then I'll begin.


Lindt replied, saying it is likely to do with storage at too high a temperature so I will be getting a fiver in vouchers. (Not usable, alas, at Tesco and CoOp.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Was that the Hare Krishna place? I can't remember exactly where it was (or maybe still is) but it was somewhere around Oxford Street.
    • The "for sale" section on this forum lets people offer things for free or cheaply. And the "wanted" section let's people ask for things they want or need, for free or cheaply. There are also existing schemes like Freecycle, and also local  food banks. And there is (or was) a local scheme where you can bring things to be repaired free. I think it is/was based in Nunhead. Isn't that simpler than having a barter system? You might have something to give away, but the person who wants it might not have anything you want. Or have I misunderstood how it works? I can see that offering services free might not fit into existing schemes, but depending on what they were, what would happen if things went horribly wrong eg someone wrecked your house? Sorry if the above sounds very negative. 
    • I'm wondering why they would do that? Because surely positive reviews could only help them, and if they thought they might get negative reviews, shouldn't they have been addressing the reasons that might be (unless someone had an unwarranted grudge against them)? But in any case, how could they have stopped people posting reviews on here? PS I have corrected your typo! 😃
    • Agreed. Just stating as a historic fact they tried to stiffle reviews.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...