Jump to content

Recommended Posts

ken78 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> wordsworth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > 🙄🙄🙄

> > >

> > > I don't do "important community work".

> > >

> > > My partner and I run music gigs (or did) and

> > have

> > > organised music stages at some community

> > events.

> > >

> > > Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, BTW.

> >

> >

> > No it isn't necessarily

>

> sue who had a go at you for you to say this "

> Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit" was it me ?????



No.

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus, get a grip, you're embarrassing

> yourself...



And yet more proof of your bullying ...


But if people want even more proof, on the 6th Jan this year on the "we are indeed fortunate" thread, it was you who called me "Stupidcus" yet I've never resorted to calling you names


Maybe it's time people stood up and say "no more" when you belittle them and the forum can get back to a place of lively discussions, humour and fun again instead of the seething cesspit of rage that it often is now.

Trolley Snatcha Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > 🙄🙄🙄

> >

> > I don't do "important community work".

> >

> > My partner and I run music gigs (or did) and

> have

> > organised music stages at some community

> events.

> >

> > Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, BTW.

>

>

> Wow! your partner and you run music gigs? I bet

> they were proper raucous affairs! And what of

> these music stages you speak of- im most

> intrigued, since Glastonbury is off ive been

> looking for an altenative.

>

> whatever would the good folk of ED do without you?



You're a real asset to this forum, aren't you?


(That was sarcastic, BTW)

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > it was you who called me "Stupidcus" yet I've

> > never resorted to calling you names

>

> Well, if you insist on posting stupid comments.

> How's your 'state sponsored genocide' plan

> going?...


Still trying to destroy my character rather than posting constructive comments ...


Sticks and stones ....


I never said state sponsored genocide, that's your comment and opinion ....


But if you want me to resort to your playground tactics


diable rouge is a BULLY

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > it was you who called me "Stupidcus" yet I've

> > never resorted to calling you names

>

> Well, if you insist on posting stupid comments.

> How's your 'state sponsored genocide' plan

> going?...


DR, there does seem to be quite prevalent attitude on here along the lines of "well if someone says something 'stupid' they're going to get 'called out' for it" (not your words (that I've seen), to be fair)....but is that really how we collectively want the vibe of this forum to be? SO people are hesitant to express a view? When people feel attacked for saying what they think, their inclination will be to 'dig in/double down'...whereas if they feel there is a decent two way street, then they may concede certain points and end up softening their view anyway.


And who is the arbiter of a 'stupid'? comment anyway? Perhaps trying to understand why someone has said something that you think is 'stupid' might be a more productive use of keystrokes?

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> diable rouge Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Spartacus Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> >

> > > it was you who called me "Stupidcus" yet I've

> > > never resorted to calling you names

> >

> > Well, if you insist on posting stupid comments.

> > How's your 'state sponsored genocide' plan

> > going?...

>

> DR, there does seem to be quite prevalent attitude

> on here along the lines of "well if someone says

> something 'stupid' they're going to get 'called

> out' for it" (not your words (that I've seen), to

> be fair)....but is that really how we collectively

> want the vibe of this forum to be? SO people are

> hesitant to express a view? When people feel

> attacked for saying what they think, their

> inclination will be to 'dig in/double

> down'...whereas if they feel there is a decent two

> way street, then they may concede certain points

> and end up softening their view anyway.


That assumes that a poster is inclined to soften their view. I'm not sure that's the case with some posters.

If you look at the 'Deniers' thread I did exactly that and he double downed.



> And who is the arbiter of a 'stupid'? comment

> anyway? Perhaps trying to understand why someone

> has said something that you think is 'stupid'

> might be a more productive use of keystrokes?


I understood what he said, and indeed kept saying.

Context is everything...

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ken78 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > wordsworth Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Sue Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > 🙄🙄🙄

> > > >

> > > > I don't do "important community work".

> > > >

> > > > My partner and I run music gigs (or did)

> and

> > > have

> > > > organised music stages at some community

> > > events.

> > > >

> > > > Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, BTW.

> > >

> > >

> > > No it isn't necessarily

> >

> > sue who had a go at you for you to say this "

> > Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit" was it me

> ?????

>

>

> No.


shame

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's really cool, how do you make the letters go

> bold like that ?



You do it as you would in html.


You will have to Google it as I can't work out a way to do it unless I do a screenshot of what I type.

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > That's really cool, how do you make the letters

> go

> > bold like that ?

>

> Magic

>

> I could show you but when I type the commands in

> it makes the text bold so it doesn't help ...

>

> Lol



I tried to do that by putting "close bracket" in the first command and "open bracket" in the second command, instead of the actual (well, the other way round) but that didn't work either!

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Okay

> I did send it to kid

> But

> And admin don't shoot me for this

>

> Type the following without spaces

>

> your text

>

> Which results in

>

> your text

>

> Please pay ?2 to my PayPal account

> Name SpartacusWantsAComedyShowcase



Ah! I hadn't thought of doing it with spaces!


But I use b, not strong .

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh - I found a little tutorial site.

>

> https://www.w3schools.com/html/default.asp



I think that was where I learned html what seems like zillions of years ago. Over a very intensive weekend.


Then I spent the next weekend learning CSS.


It was very useful at the time 😶

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Amazing I remember when all this was brand new.

> Makes me feel ancient.

>


Looking back, this must have been about twenty years ago.


Putting together a website from scratch.


Bloody hell. Twenty years!!! 😮😮😮

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...