Jump to content

Recommended Posts

ken78 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> wordsworth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > 🙄🙄🙄

> > >

> > > I don't do "important community work".

> > >

> > > My partner and I run music gigs (or did) and

> > have

> > > organised music stages at some community

> > events.

> > >

> > > Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, BTW.

> >

> >

> > No it isn't necessarily

>

> sue who had a go at you for you to say this "

> Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit" was it me ?????



No.

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus, get a grip, you're embarrassing

> yourself...



And yet more proof of your bullying ...


But if people want even more proof, on the 6th Jan this year on the "we are indeed fortunate" thread, it was you who called me "Stupidcus" yet I've never resorted to calling you names


Maybe it's time people stood up and say "no more" when you belittle them and the forum can get back to a place of lively discussions, humour and fun again instead of the seething cesspit of rage that it often is now.

Trolley Snatcha Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > 🙄🙄🙄

> >

> > I don't do "important community work".

> >

> > My partner and I run music gigs (or did) and

> have

> > organised music stages at some community

> events.

> >

> > Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, BTW.

>

>

> Wow! your partner and you run music gigs? I bet

> they were proper raucous affairs! And what of

> these music stages you speak of- im most

> intrigued, since Glastonbury is off ive been

> looking for an altenative.

>

> whatever would the good folk of ED do without you?



You're a real asset to this forum, aren't you?


(That was sarcastic, BTW)

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > it was you who called me "Stupidcus" yet I've

> > never resorted to calling you names

>

> Well, if you insist on posting stupid comments.

> How's your 'state sponsored genocide' plan

> going?...


Still trying to destroy my character rather than posting constructive comments ...


Sticks and stones ....


I never said state sponsored genocide, that's your comment and opinion ....


But if you want me to resort to your playground tactics


diable rouge is a BULLY

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > it was you who called me "Stupidcus" yet I've

> > never resorted to calling you names

>

> Well, if you insist on posting stupid comments.

> How's your 'state sponsored genocide' plan

> going?...


DR, there does seem to be quite prevalent attitude on here along the lines of "well if someone says something 'stupid' they're going to get 'called out' for it" (not your words (that I've seen), to be fair)....but is that really how we collectively want the vibe of this forum to be? SO people are hesitant to express a view? When people feel attacked for saying what they think, their inclination will be to 'dig in/double down'...whereas if they feel there is a decent two way street, then they may concede certain points and end up softening their view anyway.


And who is the arbiter of a 'stupid'? comment anyway? Perhaps trying to understand why someone has said something that you think is 'stupid' might be a more productive use of keystrokes?

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> diable rouge Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Spartacus Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> >

> > > it was you who called me "Stupidcus" yet I've

> > > never resorted to calling you names

> >

> > Well, if you insist on posting stupid comments.

> > How's your 'state sponsored genocide' plan

> > going?...

>

> DR, there does seem to be quite prevalent attitude

> on here along the lines of "well if someone says

> something 'stupid' they're going to get 'called

> out' for it" (not your words (that I've seen), to

> be fair)....but is that really how we collectively

> want the vibe of this forum to be? SO people are

> hesitant to express a view? When people feel

> attacked for saying what they think, their

> inclination will be to 'dig in/double

> down'...whereas if they feel there is a decent two

> way street, then they may concede certain points

> and end up softening their view anyway.


That assumes that a poster is inclined to soften their view. I'm not sure that's the case with some posters.

If you look at the 'Deniers' thread I did exactly that and he double downed.



> And who is the arbiter of a 'stupid'? comment

> anyway? Perhaps trying to understand why someone

> has said something that you think is 'stupid'

> might be a more productive use of keystrokes?


I understood what he said, and indeed kept saying.

Context is everything...

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ken78 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > wordsworth Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Sue Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > 🙄🙄🙄

> > > >

> > > > I don't do "important community work".

> > > >

> > > > My partner and I run music gigs (or did)

> and

> > > have

> > > > organised music stages at some community

> > > events.

> > > >

> > > > Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, BTW.

> > >

> > >

> > > No it isn't necessarily

> >

> > sue who had a go at you for you to say this "

> > Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit" was it me

> ?????

>

>

> No.


shame

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's really cool, how do you make the letters go

> bold like that ?



You do it as you would in html.


You will have to Google it as I can't work out a way to do it unless I do a screenshot of what I type.

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > That's really cool, how do you make the letters

> go

> > bold like that ?

>

> Magic

>

> I could show you but when I type the commands in

> it makes the text bold so it doesn't help ...

>

> Lol



I tried to do that by putting "close bracket" in the first command and "open bracket" in the second command, instead of the actual (well, the other way round) but that didn't work either!

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Okay

> I did send it to kid

> But

> And admin don't shoot me for this

>

> Type the following without spaces

>

> your text

>

> Which results in

>

> your text

>

> Please pay ?2 to my PayPal account

> Name SpartacusWantsAComedyShowcase



Ah! I hadn't thought of doing it with spaces!


But I use b, not strong .

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh - I found a little tutorial site.

>

> https://www.w3schools.com/html/default.asp



I think that was where I learned html what seems like zillions of years ago. Over a very intensive weekend.


Then I spent the next weekend learning CSS.


It was very useful at the time 😶

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Amazing I remember when all this was brand new.

> Makes me feel ancient.

>


Looking back, this must have been about twenty years ago.


Putting together a website from scratch.


Bloody hell. Twenty years!!! 😮😮😮

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...