Jump to content

Forum decorum

Sue

By Sue
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Sue

Sue

Posted
  • Author
Posted

ken78 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> wordsworth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > 🙄🙄🙄

> > >

> > > I don't do "important community work".

> > >

> > > My partner and I run music gigs (or did) and

> > have

> > > organised music stages at some community

> > events.

> > >

> > > Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, BTW.

> >

> >

> > No it isn't necessarily

>

> sue who had a go at you for you to say this "

> Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit" was it me ?????



No.

Spartacus

Spartacus

Posted
Posted

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus, get a grip, you're embarrassing

> yourself...



And yet more proof of your bullying ...


But if people want even more proof, on the 6th Jan this year on the "we are indeed fortunate" thread, it was you who called me "Stupidcus" yet I've never resorted to calling you names


Maybe it's time people stood up and say "no more" when you belittle them and the forum can get back to a place of lively discussions, humour and fun again instead of the seething cesspit of rage that it often is now.

Sue

Sue

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Trolley Snatcha Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > 🙄🙄🙄

> >

> > I don't do "important community work".

> >

> > My partner and I run music gigs (or did) and

> have

> > organised music stages at some community

> events.

> >

> > Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, BTW.

>

>

> Wow! your partner and you run music gigs? I bet

> they were proper raucous affairs! And what of

> these music stages you speak of- im most

> intrigued, since Glastonbury is off ive been

> looking for an altenative.

>

> whatever would the good folk of ED do without you?



You're a real asset to this forum, aren't you?


(That was sarcastic, BTW)

Spartacus

Spartacus

Posted
Posted

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > it was you who called me "Stupidcus" yet I've

> > never resorted to calling you names

>

> Well, if you insist on posting stupid comments.

> How's your 'state sponsored genocide' plan

> going?...


Still trying to destroy my character rather than posting constructive comments ...


Sticks and stones ....


I never said state sponsored genocide, that's your comment and opinion ....


But if you want me to resort to your playground tactics


diable rouge is a BULLY

TheCat

TheCat

Posted
Posted

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spartacus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > it was you who called me "Stupidcus" yet I've

> > never resorted to calling you names

>

> Well, if you insist on posting stupid comments.

> How's your 'state sponsored genocide' plan

> going?...


DR, there does seem to be quite prevalent attitude on here along the lines of "well if someone says something 'stupid' they're going to get 'called out' for it" (not your words (that I've seen), to be fair)....but is that really how we collectively want the vibe of this forum to be? SO people are hesitant to express a view? When people feel attacked for saying what they think, their inclination will be to 'dig in/double down'...whereas if they feel there is a decent two way street, then they may concede certain points and end up softening their view anyway.


And who is the arbiter of a 'stupid'? comment anyway? Perhaps trying to understand why someone has said something that you think is 'stupid' might be a more productive use of keystrokes?

diable rouge

diable rouge

Posted
Posted

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> diable rouge Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Spartacus Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> >

> > > it was you who called me "Stupidcus" yet I've

> > > never resorted to calling you names

> >

> > Well, if you insist on posting stupid comments.

> > How's your 'state sponsored genocide' plan

> > going?...

>

> DR, there does seem to be quite prevalent attitude

> on here along the lines of "well if someone says

> something 'stupid' they're going to get 'called

> out' for it" (not your words (that I've seen), to

> be fair)....but is that really how we collectively

> want the vibe of this forum to be? SO people are

> hesitant to express a view? When people feel

> attacked for saying what they think, their

> inclination will be to 'dig in/double

> down'...whereas if they feel there is a decent two

> way street, then they may concede certain points

> and end up softening their view anyway.


That assumes that a poster is inclined to soften their view. I'm not sure that's the case with some posters.

If you look at the 'Deniers' thread I did exactly that and he double downed.



> And who is the arbiter of a 'stupid'? comment

> anyway? Perhaps trying to understand why someone

> has said something that you think is 'stupid'

> might be a more productive use of keystrokes?


I understood what he said, and indeed kept saying.

Context is everything...

ken78

ken78

Posted
Posted

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ken78 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > wordsworth Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Sue Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > 🙄🙄🙄

> > > >

> > > > I don't do "important community work".

> > > >

> > > > My partner and I run music gigs (or did)

> and

> > > have

> > > > organised music stages at some community

> > > events.

> > > >

> > > > Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, BTW.

> > >

> > >

> > > No it isn't necessarily

> >

> > sue who had a go at you for you to say this "

> > Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit" was it me

> ?????

>

>

> No.


shame

Sue

Sue

Posted
  • Author
Posted

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's really cool, how do you make the letters go

> bold like that ?



You do it as you would in html.


You will have to Google it as I can't work out a way to do it unless I do a screenshot of what I type.

Sue

Sue

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > That's really cool, how do you make the letters

> go

> > bold like that ?

>

> Magic

>

> I could show you but when I type the commands in

> it makes the text bold so it doesn't help ...

>

> Lol



I tried to do that by putting "close bracket" in the first command and "open bracket" in the second command, instead of the actual (well, the other way round) but that didn't work either!

Sue

Sue

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Okay

> I did send it to kid

> But

> And admin don't shoot me for this

>

> Type the following without spaces

>

> your text

>

> Which results in

>

> your text

>

> Please pay ?2 to my PayPal account

> Name SpartacusWantsAComedyShowcase



Ah! I hadn't thought of doing it with spaces!


But I use b, not strong .

Sue

Sue

Posted
  • Author
Posted

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh - I found a little tutorial site.

>

> https://www.w3schools.com/html/default.asp



I think that was where I learned html what seems like zillions of years ago. Over a very intensive weekend.


Then I spent the next weekend learning CSS.


It was very useful at the time 😶

Sue

Sue

Posted
  • Author
Posted

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Amazing I remember when all this was brand new.

> Makes me feel ancient.

>


Looking back, this must have been about twenty years ago.


Putting together a website from scratch.


Bloody hell. Twenty years!!! 😮😮😮

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • march46
      Application for Londis Off-Licence next to Charter East Entrance

      By march46 · Posted

      Big Bellies didn’t have permission.  
    • CP_ED
      Application for Londis Off-Licence next to Charter East Entrance

      By CP_ED · Posted

      Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • teddyboy23
      New Empanada Place on LL

      By teddyboy23 · Posted

      The lady is called Janet 
    • FellbriggSam
      Tree Killer – Seeking Advice on Dealing with Toxic Neighbours

      By FellbriggSam · Posted

      He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...