Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Both sides are arguing and disagreeing about who's adhering to the agreement properly or not. That's typically how these things work, both sides push the envelope as I said.


It's informative that you automatically assume that the EU is doing the right thing, and the UK is at fault.


Can't really have much of a productive discussion when that's the default position you start from on any dispute.


Also....this line of argument that people who voted leave are all now 'surprised' the UK is being treated like a third country is growing tiresome. Yes, the UK is a third country as far as the EU is concerned...that will sometimes involve disputes, arguments and (hopefully) resolutions, as it does between any nations who are not in a customs union (I.e. most nations on earth)...that's not a suprise.

Africa and Asia are gradually creating the supra national bodies for custom unions etc.


West Africa http://www.uemoa.int/en/about-uemoa, South Africa https://www.sacu.int/, East Africa https://www.eac.int/customs-union, North Africa https://maghrebarabe.org/, South East Asia https://asean.org/


Its the direction of travel though - most are heading towards furthest local integration whilst we are moving away from that.

You were the one the brought the fishing dispute into a discussion about how EU citizens are shamefully treated in UK


Most nations have trade agreements based on a willingness to give up some sovereignty to gain advantage (with relative power playing a part)


UK has spent most of it's time doing the opposite and won't countenance ANY ceding of sovereignty - especially involving EU. SO the problems are not going away any time soon


I didn't say the EU is doing the right thing - I said the French were well within their rights

I really don't want to see Scotland leave the UK, just as I didn't want to see the UK leave the EU. But I think it's kind of inevitable that eventually Ireland will be reunited and Scotland will assert independence. I hope I'm wrong, but I can see years of slow decline ahead of us as a result of Brexit. I suspect our children's generation will not look back kindly on what has happened under our watch.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I see perhaps a federal system if Scotland doesn't

> leave.

>

> If you really have 4 equal countries then one

> can't make all the decisions.


It?s hard to have four equal countries if one is ten times the size of the others.

alex_b Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I see perhaps a federal system if Scotland

> doesn't

> > leave.

> >

> > If you really have 4 equal countries then one

> > can't make all the decisions.

>

> It?s hard to have four equal countries if one is

> ten times the size of the others.



Absolutely, you cant have a federalized model with England being so much larger than the other parts of the UK....just not sustainable. Even with English devolvement being a feature...I just cant see it working effectively.


Perhaps you could split England up 'Game of Thrones' style.....i.e. The North etc etc...I thin Boris might fancy himself as King of the Seven Kingdoms, first of his name, protector of the realm:)

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> alex_b Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > JohnL Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I see perhaps a federal system if Scotland

> > doesn't

> > > leave.

> > >

> > > If you really have 4 equal countries then one

> > > can't make all the decisions.

> >

> > It?s hard to have four equal countries if one

> is

> > ten times the size of the others.

>

>

> Absolutely, you cant have a federalized model with

> England being so much larger than the other parts

> of the UK....just not sustainable. Even with

> English devolvement being a feature...I just cant

> see it working effectively.

>

> Perhaps you could split England up 'Game of

> Thrones' style.....i.e. The North etc etc...I thin

> Boris might fancy himself as King of the Seven

> Kingdoms, first of his name, protector of the

> realm:)


This is actually not a bad idea. Federal states of Wales, N Ireland, Scotland, Westcountry, The North, London, and herebedragons

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am struggling to understand how Green policies translate to local issues? The Southwark Greens leaflet I received reads like a general wish list but is not locally specific. I know the same can be said of other political parties. What specifically are Greens plans for housing, protecting local parks, council tax, transport and roads/ pavement upkeep, CPZ/LTNs?
    • Politician's moving from one party to another, especially when local is worth discussing. You have to wonder what they are driven by, and particularly in this instance, as their new party is moving in strange directions.
    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...