Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Given the disruption to education over the past 12 months (and continuing) is there a valid case for the government to 'write off' this academic year across all year levels?...and start afresh in September in the same school year as was started last Septmeber.


This would have the effect of basically making a permanent shift in the the ages of schooling from 4-17 to 5-18...which in itself I don't see as a massive problem, as arguably kids start school too young in the UK anyway.


A key issue obviously comes at each end of that age range...parents expecting their 4 year olds to start school this September would suddenly be asked to wait another year (so the govt may have to provide further childcare funding support), and those who thought they were off into the world or off to uni at the end of this academic year will have another year to wait. Obviously this will see knock on effects at Universities...but if properly funded by the government (i.e. effectively underwrite university fees this year), then it could mean something similar is done at tertiary level, which wouldn't be the worst thing in the world, given the cohort of students who were set to graduate this year would be let loose on a jobs market which will have no jobs for them in 2021 (giving the economy a year to recover could make a lot of sense for hiring plans to normalise). And of course what of children who go to pvt schools...should parents be asked to pay an additional year of tuition from what they originally expected?


Anyway, plenty of practical problems with such a suggestion...but would they be insurmountable when offset against the potential problems arising for children's education that such a drastic move might solve?

I do remember as a 16 year feeling that missing a year or resitting it seemed it would be the biggest disaster in the world.


At 25 it seemed like not much really - just a year - the most important thing is your goal being something you really want and that it'll make you happy and also it's obtainable/realistic. Many people do the same job for years on end.


If we do make them redo it lets give them counsel as to what they want and how they should go about getting it so they won't regret what they choose to do.

There?s no easy solution, especially given the wide variability in lockdown provision between schools. I?m aware even within ED there is a huge difference in what schools are providing. I know my son would be distraught at being asked to do the same stuff for another year.


It would present huge infrastructure problems - you?d effectively have to create a whole new year of nursery supply for delayed reception children. At the other end, how do Universities pay their bills if they have no intake for a year?


The thought has occurred to me but the financial and practical implications are massive. Given everything central and local government has to do to rollout the vaccine and respond to all the issues, I?d be amazed if there is capacity to deal with everything that this would need.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...