Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi EDF readers. My name is Lou Smith, formally of Captured on the Rye creative party business which, like many other businesses, has been decimated by the Covid Pandemic. I am writing to ask for support to help persuade Southwark Council to reverse their decision to force me to take down the shed which has been my creative sanctuary for nearly two years and is threatened because of a single complaint from a neighbour. I have enlisted the help of local councillors and MP, and have created a petition which has already raised nearly 1200 signatures in just a few days. I would be grateful if you could take two minutes to read more about the petition and consider signing it too. At 1500 signatures it will qualify to be heard at Council Assembly, the highest tier of local government. Thank you for reading. https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/save-our-shed-do-the-right-thing-southwark
The issue is that as a leaseholder of LBS they own the garden despite several attempts by myself to buy it. Yes the shed is of a size that would fall below the need for planning permission, but despite the complaining other leaseholder having a shed, the Council have at their discretion disallowed mine. The resident services officer stated that he didn't object to my having a shed, nor to its placement, but thought 'it was just too big' It is a subjective decision, not an objective one.

So I guess I'm curious.


Does the freeholder's say outweigh the leaseholder in every instance? I rent, and I know I'm not able to make changes to the property as its not owned by myself. Does the same hold true if you have a 100 year lease?


I imagine you wouldn't be able to add an extension to the back of the house or anything like that since eventually the lease would end and the property/land would revert back to the freeholder.


I imagine you'd need the freeholder's permission for that first. I'd figure the same would be true for a building added in the garden. Or is this incorrect?

Signed!

The background to your story resonated with me having gone through a similarly dreadful time in the space of a year.

I sincerely wish you every success in this-you deserve to have this sanctuary and shouldn't be put in fear of losing your home.

Good luck!

EDguy89 It would make sense to agree to a temporary structure to be erected in the garden of a property with a 100+ year lease as it could always be removed. The garden is owned by the freeholder though and that is the issue here. The fact that the other leaseholder has done and continues to do far more in the way of actual structural alterations and actual law of the land breaking without suffering any such blowback is what's eating me up here. If it was an isolated incident of I broke the rules, I got caught, then I would go quietly. Unfairness on this level though, I just can't stomach.

lousmith Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> EDguy89 It would make sense to agree to a

> temporary structure to be erected in the garden of

> a property with a 100+ year lease as it could

> always be removed. The garden is owned by the

> freeholder though and that is the issue here. The

> fact that the other leaseholder has done and

> continues to do far more in the way of actual

> structural alterations and actual law of the land

> breaking without suffering any such blowback is

> what's eating me up here. If it was an isolated

> incident of I broke the rules, I got caught, then

> I would go quietly. Unfairness on this level

> though, I just can't stomach.


Ok, so essentially it boils down to you did something you shouldn't, but feel that you shouldn't rectify that issue as long as the other tenant who has also done something they shouldn't doesn't face any consequences?

Actually there is nothing specific in my lease to preclude the building of a shed, it is a discretionary decision on the part of the council, whereas the other leaseholder has broken multiple clauses of his lease in addition to actual laws. That is the unfairness to which i refer. I'm sure you would feel the same in my position. I am unable to go into full details here, but to be in possession of all the facts is to understand my position.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...