Jump to content

Recommended Posts

>

> We are becoming a society where we judge via

> social media based on what Karen put on facebook

> without examining the truth to draw our own

> conclusions.


The Truth, Your Truth, My Truth, Meaghans Truth, Seabag's Mate's Crazy Nanobot Truth....


Of course how much weight is placed on different truths depends on how oppressed/virtuous/prejudiced the person who said it is percieved to be by the person making the judgment on level of truth. Using this method, we as social media users (and as the broader public) can apportion 'truth quotients' in the appropriate amount to suit our own views.

'

Unfort as you say Spartacus, no one gives a sh!t about 'the' truth anymore. The truth is so slow and boring to get to....instant indignation and kneejerk judgement provide much more instant gratification....

Oprahs certainly got a following in the US.


I understand her saying "your truth" in the sense in school you'll ask both sides in the playground fight for "their side of the story" - it's a bit of an Americanism possibly.


Possibly the real truth can't be found only many conflicting accounts.

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The truth is so slow and boring to get to...


Politicians have caught on that you can tell a lie and it firmly becomes embedded in their base, as well as going half way round the world, by the time it gets fact-checked, and as with Trump, the viewings of the lie far outnumber the fact checking...

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheCat Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > The truth is so slow and boring to get to...

>

> Politicians have caught on that you can tell a lie

> and it firmly becomes embedded in their base, as

> well as going half way round the world, by the

> time it gets fact-checked, and as with Trump, the

> viewings of the lie far outnumber the fact

> checking...


very true....


...or it is?:)

Regardless of where you stand on the interview, the reality is that we have been given a gift with the new term 'my truth' which I hadn't come across before, and I, for one, can't wait to start using it:


'You say I'm late, but my truth is that your watch must be broken'

'You say I've cocked it up; my truth is that it is the best thing since sliced bread'

'The deal feel through, but my truth is that it is a roaring success'

'You say it is raining and that I should take an umbrella, but my truth is that I'm in the Caribbean and I'm going to go out in a bikini'


The possibilities are endless.

Of course with Beth Rigby back he won't get away with it so much - I have missed her.


@bethrigby "Labour source telling me they think Johnson misled the house because they say party didn?t vote against the NHS funding bill & it was nodded through....so expect Labour to raise a point of order at the end of #PMQs"


Misogyny


Racism


Insidious, pernicious, thinly veiled, institutional and systemic.


The message being when will women and people of colour learn to be pipe down and be quiet? They bring it on themselves.


So it continues...?..and it saddens me that much of this thread stinks of it.

Exactly. It?s tiresome and seems like a losing battle. For my own sanity I have to avoid getting involved in things like this as I?m constantly dismissed.




binkylilyput Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Misogyny

>

> Racism

>

> Insidious, pernicious, thinly veiled,

> institutional and systemic.

>

> The message being when will women and people of

> colour learn to be pipe down and be quiet? They

> bring it on themselves.

>

> So it continues...?..and it saddens me that much

> of this thread stinks of it.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LOL - Meghan is on the warpath now.

>

> Piers no longer cock of the walk. I haven't

> heard from Uncle for a while either.



Are you implying that uncle is Piers


Wow wouldn't that be a revelation

Naughty girl Meghan. Sit down. Don't make a fuss. Know your place.


(along with 41,000 complaints to Ofcom)



Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is a story on the news that Meghan had now

> complained about Piers' comments to ITV ...

>

> Does this potentially mean that anyone who

> disagrees with her comments on here will be

> contacted by her lawyer ?

Diana went on TV. Edward and Simpson went on TV. Sometimes enough is enough and in order to get closure and to get your truth out, you go public. I know I certainly would.


Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's more about the way of her complaint. If she

> chooses to go on mainstream TV and talk to Oprah,

> it's pretty obvious she has goals in mind

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/mar/10/soci

> ety-of-editors-steps-back-claim-racism-no-part-meg

> han-coverage?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other


At least they have stepped back from what was claim we can see with our own eyes is not true.


Obviously that does not mean there isn't ?a proud history of campaigning for freedom of speech and the vital work that journalists do in a democracy to hold power to account? also.

binkylilyput Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Misogyny

>

> Racism

>

> Insidious, pernicious, thinly veiled,

> institutional and systemic.

>

> The message being when will women and people of

> colour learn to be pipe down and be quiet? They

> bring it on themselves.

>

> So it continues...?..and it saddens me that much

> of this thread stinks of it.



Honestly. What a complete load of sh!t. Sounds like we're all 'saddended' then, as it saddens me that you feel comfortable just 'assuming' you know what drives other people's comments, becuase its suits your pre-existing beleifs to do so.


Tell me....can any criticism of someone's behaviour always be boiled down to their race and gender?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Today I learned that living in a 5 bedroom, £2m+ house in Dulwich is basically like being in prison. Honestly, CPR Dave is the finest-crafted persona on the forum. He never fails to suck people in - I fall for it every time. It's top quality trolling (in the original sense of the word). From the Subtle Art of Trolling: troll v.,n. To utter a posting on Usenet designed to attract predictable responses or flames. Derives from the phrase "trolling for newbies"; which in turn comes from mainstream "trolling";, a style of fishing in which one trails bait through a likely spot hoping for a bite. The well-constructed troll is a post that induces lots of newbies and flamers to make themselves look even more clueless than they already do, while subtly conveying to the more savvy and experienced that it is in fact a deliberate troll. If you don't fall for the joke, you get to be in on it. https://www.urban75.com/Mag/troll.html
    • It always amazes me how unwilling people are to pay tax. On anything. We have an amazing free at the point of use health service. We have other free at the point of use public services. Why should we not pay tax? Where else would the money come from? The Tories promised to reduce income tax (and subsequently did) in order to get elected.  It was all downhill from there, in my opinion.  Not that I know much about either economics or politics, so do feel free to explain to me the errors in my thinking. Re people living in big houses after their life situation changes, that saying about criticism and walking in someone else's moccasins springs to mind. At least, it would if I could remember exactly what it was 🤣
    • What do you all think we younger people have had to do for years if we can't afford the rent or to buy in our area?   We move AND we don't get to trouser £2M of unearned housing wealth in the process.   I no longer live where I grew up as I could not afford to stay there, same for my partner. Of course if you are unfortunate enough own a £2m house in East Dulwich,  the good news is there are plenty of houses and flats that cost considerably less than £2m so someone keen to avoid the £2m houe tax could move  and stay in the area.
    • If you are in your eighties and you now live on your own in a £2m house that you bought for £63,000 in 1968 then of course you are entitled to live there as long as you can physically do so.  But I also like to think of a local dad I know, a teacher, who lives with his wife and kids in a modern two bed flat in SE22 that they part-own (thanks to a contribution from wife's parents).  The dad goes running in Dulwich Park every morning first thing, and told me wistfully how he sometimes looks out at all these huge unused gardens with rusting trampolines and empty bedrooms and wonders how the world came to this. There's a brilliant way to avoid IHT.  It's called "give it away while you are still alive - keeping £650k + your annuity/company pension to see you through your final years".  If I have a £2m house and don't want to move or incur IHT, then there's the option of taking out a loan against the value of the house and living off that till I pop my clogs.  It's not always the most financially efficient thing to do, but as they say, you can't take it with you.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...