Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anyone else noticed a gradual increase in graffiti during the last 6 months, particularly on the shop fronts, private gates, bus shelters etc around East Dulwich road and East Dulwich grove? A bit of a worrying trend I think, and a general sign for social unrest and an increasing lack of care in the local community. Almost certainly linked to schools being out. Is anyone aware of the council taking this more seriously? Had anyone else noticed this?

Write to the councillor for your ward. They?re responsive - to some things. https://www.writetothem.com/

You can also ask the shopkeepers to clean up their acts, asking the council to help them free of charge. Just get them to ring the environment line or switchboard.

Retail needs all the help it can get so a bit of self-interest may persuade them to act.

It's the same down Rye Lane, although that's in part caused by the lane being closed to traffic so the taggers feel free to spray without being observed from passing bus passengers or police patrol cars.


One of the downsides of closing a shopping area to traffic without increasing security.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Write to the councillor for your ward. They?re

> responsive - to some things.

> https://www.writetothem.com/

> You can also ask the shopkeepers to clean up their

> acts, asking the council to help them free of

> charge. Just get them to ring the environment line

> or switchboard.

> Retail needs all the help it can get so a bit of

> self-interest may persuade them to act.


Nigello great idea for businesses to contact the council. Now they?ve got a date to work towards for reopening they are going to want to do everything they can to encourage trade when they can open again.


Hopefully schools being back and relaxation of the rules (if case numbers allow) will mean those putting the graffiti up have other things to do as the days get longer.

While and post being a Councillor I raise several hundred incidents of graffiti each year.

I've not done this during COVID as i understand the staff have been deployed to COVID related activities. This must get back to normal soon.


Anyone can report graffiti via this - https://www.southwark.gov.uk/street-care/graffiti

If you want graffiti remove from your property use the council website as you can provide the disclaimer.


Or FixMyStreet - https://www.fixmystreet.com

Landlords, and not shop managers, are sometimes the problem so it is not simply a case of saying "that shop is X, Y, Z" when it may be out of their hands to paint the property, etc. (One business that models itself as community asset told me that they though the vandalism was worthwhile because it was a valid form of self expression...) I had liked the shop and had bought stuff from it for years. No more...

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's the same down Rye Lane, although that's in

> part caused by the lane being closed to traffic so

> the taggers feel free to spray without being

> observed from passing bus passengers or police

> patrol cars.

>

> One of the downsides of closing a shopping area to

> traffic without increasing security.



They aren't cleaning it as much - the funeral parlour used to clean every bit regularly (obvious reasons) but there's a huge RICH on there now thats been there a few weeks.

If all the shops had shutters inside (like some do) there would be a much reduced incidence. It seems that all shops now have them; it was rare to see a generation or so ago. Is it compulsory re insurance, or do people just follow on and think "she's got shutters on her shop so I should as well"?


Shops are being cleaned - the top of Melbourne Grove had some properties afflicted that are now clean.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...