Jump to content

Recommended Posts

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> You can pass your driving test at 17 and then

> never have another day's training for the rest of

> your life. As well as speed awareness courses for

> those caught speeding, I'd love it if there was

> compulsory retraining for those of you who no

> longer meet the minimum standards of the driving

> test.


This was really brought home to me recently. I passed my test in my late teens but never owned a car. I drove occasionally on holiday but hadn't been behind the wheel in over a decade when I decided I was going to buy a car.

I did book a few refresher sessions with a driving instructor before doing so. I've been a cyclist commuter for years so have fairly good road awareness. But it was terrifyingly easy to get a car, get insurance as they seem only to care about how long you've had your license rather than used it.

Whilst totally off topic, the maintenance of driving standards is an important issue. Few drivers go for advanced driver training. Young/inexperienced drivers often have to behave themselves as they need a black box as part of the insurance policy but at the first opportunity get rid of this. The police have long since routinely stopped drivers for poor driving - back in the day I was stopped and also with other young drivers, by the police, for relatively minor things and then given a lecture following a quick kick of the tyres etc.


Not seen to be a good use of police time now, plus much lower numbers, but you can get away with being a poor driver and of course nobody admits to it.


More draconian punishment may work for example for hands held mobiles, but you are not going to give points/fine for those that can't be arsed to indicate, braking hard/late etc etc. I'm still thinking about putting a video up on YouTube on how to drive in traffic calmed areas (hint, minimum use of the brake)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • a - you said you were done interacting with me, remember b - " police, judge, jury, prosecution and executioner"  - the not very bright person's response on any public forum when someone point out the idiocy of anything. I haven't prosecuted anyone, executed anyone, or taken part in any trial or jury.    I have judged tho but then so do you and so did the OP - so what? 
    • And when did you become the police, judge, jury, prosecution and executioner all in one, I don't think so. And get back to Lewes
    • Yes, it is just that the local demographic is soon to have a large shift and more late night shopping catering for student needs is likely to be very popular. Presumably the massive student lodgings development plans for Melbourne Grove will have catalysed the Londis application. Wasn't there also an application for a late night bar or club at some point round there? Still, all this will help turn Melbourne Grove North into a real 'vibrant, urban destination' and 'town centre' and, for sure, we can expect lots and lots of e- bikes and scooters to be 'parked' around the place. What makes me laugh is that not so long ago the smaller housing development in the same place was being marketed as wonderful select family homes in quiet, leafy MG, with a 'villagey' feel.  As a taster for where all this might lead, has anyone noticed the crumbling brick facing on the railway development, built not so long ago? You throw 'em up and they soon start falling down. The developers make loadsa money and Councillors get to tick their boxes.
    • Stereotypes are based on actual real behaviours.  They can be inappropriately applied to a whole group and can overstep the mark, potentially being offensive.  But comments made on Corbyn and some of his followers are often accurate.  That's not saying he didn't have some good policies, often picked up by the large parties, and is not principled.  I saw him many years ago at an event celebrating Tony Benn where he was excellent.  Perfect for a back bencher. The damage caused by his Brexit stance is difficult to reverse, even ignoring the vote and the outcome, there could have been cross party working and agreement of taking it forward.  And being an apologist for Russia is just ridiculous.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...