-
-
Latest Discussions
-
- had all the wrong connections at the wrong time - fraternised with some well dodgy blokes or rather one at least - smart and smooth talker - he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter - he is highly polished - skilled at making personal connections - never liked or trusted the chap, reminiscent of a slime ball -
By mccatonline · Posted
A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567 -
I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor? -
By ArchieCarlos · Posted
Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.