Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mum died last year and we've just managed to sell her bungalow.


Every month since December I've done the 400 mile round trip because the purchaser said they were going to complete.. cut to last week when we finally DID Exchange and beggar me! Went in to check all was in order to Complete and... we've had a slow leak from the boiler which has wrecked the boiler, brought the lounge ceiling down etc. etc.


The Purchaser is supposed to move in on Wednesday but we've just discovered the 1950's hidden floor tiles and ceiling contains white asbestos.... My insurance will (hopefully) make good on the remedial work (save high value items and now boiler ofc!) But... it wouldn't be safe for the new couple to move in as yet. As goodwill I'll pay for new boiler and make sure remedial work with all relevant certificates done for new owners but... does anyone know who is liable for sorting out alternative accommodation for the buyers until property is fixed? My personal cost to fix this is already at 3K and I really can't afford to put them up and pay for their move.


Any insight or experience greatly appreciated :D


I went for the conveyancing house route given it should have been the simplest sale and they really don't know now what do do .... anyone has a similar experience?

Whenever I?ve purchased a house I?ve been advised to have insurance in place from exchange for precisely this reason. I?d be tempted to leave the insurers to sort it out otherwise you may wind up paying out of pocket for something the purchasers insurers would have picked up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I normally vote Lib Dem and will continue to do so.
    • the reason Tories have lost votes is because they have lost trust primarily. the voters didn't vote for what the Tories did, but what they promised. you can't blame the voters for the outcome, just because they voted for the party. Labour are in a position of influence so we will have to see what they do.  Reform are there, as quite a presence should Labour continue to fail. It feels as if we are on a very thin line
    • I agree with that The voters authorised strong austerity in 2010 and kept voting for it for 14 years - for that reason alone, given Labour have been in power for only months I can't find my else able to equate them as bad as each other. Yet. It may happen and given Labour's poor decision making and comms to date I wouldn't be surprised if they end up that way Problem is the voters say they want one thing (lower prices/better public services/things working) but then don't reward any government that tries to deliver -  and they explicitly said they wanted higher prices with Brexit and lower public services by voting Cons in for 14 years - so they got what they wanted, they just don't like the reality Whoever is elected now has to find a way to address those years of underinvestment and diminished growth - there is no painless way out. But blaming immigration for everything (Reform speciality) is only making everything worse
    • That’s good to know, but it just wasn’t clear to me.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...