Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I doubt Farage's loons will believe it - not sure I do myself, I can hear him in 2016 now...


"Yes we promised a referendum but the world has moved on since then, things have changed and the in-out question is no longer relevant to the health of this country going forward. Now is not the time for playing politics with peoples' futures, it is the time for ensuring the long-term prosperity of the nation as a whole. I think it would be a very irresponsible government that would put Britain's economy at risk at such a crucial time."


Still, probably enough to keep his rebels in line for a while.

That fact that it's a simple in/out referendum is crucial to the anticipated outcome - by avoiding a 'devo max' scenario the risks involved in being 'out' are maximised, and human nature is far more sensitized to tangible losses than it is to hypothetical gains.


As with Scotland, the push for an in/out binary choice means Cameron wants 'in' as the response.


The isolationists are only cheering this because they're too daft to see 2 moves ahead.


It's silly to think the commitment to a referendum is going to shut them up though - attacking Europe is a kind of mental Tourette's Syndrome for them.

Jeremy Wrote:

> I'm not convinced that joe public has a good

> enough understanding of such issues.


Particularly in this case, when the political class for decades has failed spectacularly to articulate clearly the genuine pros and cons of our membership of the EU - and no, rolling out onto TV some "big businessmen" and a few antiquated ex-politicians now safely tucked up in Brussels won't do it.


The cosy consensus is coming back to bite all three parties on the bum - and quite right too. The only potential good to come out of ths referendum malarkey is the faint possibility of a proper debate based on matters other than prejudice and venal self-interest. I'm not holding my breath, though...


FWIW I think we should stay in.

The Tories are always scuppered by the Scots constituencies- the last 2 general elections would have been Tory majorities if it was not for the inclusion of the Scots MPs.

What adds insult to injury is that they get a vote on our policies and influence what goes on in England but English MPs have no influence over theirs!

The SNP did badly in the last Election because there was tactical voting by the Scots electorate to try to keep Labour in and therefore keep Gordon Brown in and protect their own interests- ie by getting more money diverted from England (especially the SE) into Scotland.

That's not true uncleglen.


Only certain powers are devolved to Scotland - many issues of UK national policies are retained in London.


That's why the Scots MPs are entitled to those votes unless they are independent.


The general tone of your argument is that Scottish people are deliberately manipulating their voting rights to stop the UK being governed properly.


I think that's a rather silly interpretation that only aims to sow discord.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...