Jump to content

Recommended Posts

https://refugetechsafety.org/


Radio 4 Woman's Hour has done a programme on domestic violence this morning with quite a lot of info about DV via tech (stalking online, hacking etc.). Programme available on Listen Again: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m000vz82 and Refuge's new website above.

redpost Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't click on the link!! it's a scammer


I am not a scammer. I have been a member for several years and, given my past career in legal aid, have often posted useful links. The link goes to the REfuge website. Refuge is a charity advising and representing victims of domestic violence.

Apologies, or perhaps it's an attempt to obfuscate what the user was doing when they close the site - but doesn't seem to work very well and loads of redirects makes it look like a scam


Perhaps advise people to only access site through private browsing?

redpost Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Perhaps someone has hacked the site then

>

> Go to site, click 'exit site' it then pops up 2

> windows one of which does a load of redirects too

> quick for me to see what is happening



The exit the site immediately button is in case you need to quickly put up a neutral page (i.e. your abuser has just come in and wants to know what you're doing), not for leaving a website as one would do normally.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Politician's moving from one party to another, especially when local is worth discussing. You have to wonder what they are driven by, and particularly in this instance, as their new party is moving in strange directions.
    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
    • Yeah  Ban people, that will solve all the planets environmental issues over night  Leave the dogs as they aren't the problem, its normally bad ownership and management that leads to badly behaved dogs. Spartacus  Ps Cat Rule 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...