Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I haven't had time to wade through the decent discussion on the site about the threatened closure of at least parts of Lewisham. I was at the march on Saturday and my instinct is that it is all wrong. I also had the pleasure of working for DH (in another field) and there has been no example in recent history of a whole ministerial team being sacked. Burstowe for letting the cock up of public health and NHS reform happening on his Lib Dem patch, and Lansley for the "no top down reorganisation of the NHS" about turn. So then they get the evil enforcer in Hunt.


Anyway rant over. Back to instinct. We had child number one at a relatively new Lewisham maternity ward. The NCT told us that the NHS would tie the mother into some archaic birthing position and fill her full of drugs before relenting to the scapel. They were actually pleased we had a birthing plan. Sadly the radio wasn't working so the father could not listen to TMS. The public maternity ward was madness with TVs blaring and even a church service at one point. But we have erased this from the collective memories.


Fast forward three years and a move of house and Kings was now the selected maternity ward. No thanks we will have him/her at home. Southwark NHS were fine, and there were no complications (or we would have been down to the hospital liek a flash before we debate the risks of home births). Just didn's seem as nice at Kings as at Lewisham (and we use the former as our usual hospital for a number of relatively routine appointments). Maybe it was the difficult parking that put us off rather than the chaos of numerous wards crammed into a small space.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...