Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Exactly this - if you look at something like google streetview on historic images you can see that the opposite side has always been fully parked up. The barriers aren't as wide as the cars were so it doesn't seem a reason to leave the bus stop closed.
I think that the question as to whether the barriers on the other side go will be dependent on when social distancing is officially ended - but lets not wrap the two up together. There is no logical reason to keep the bus stop closed and it should be reopened. Separately there is a question as to whether the pavement widening needs to be retained, but I'd avoid joining the points together as can see that could delay the bus stop reopening.

The two are wrapped up together though. They both do absolutely nothing to stop the spread of Covid. There wasn't even any logic to putting the barriers there where shops have large forecourts and wide pavements as opposed to those with no such space and an actually narrow pavement, like the cheese block, smbs etc.


But entirely coincidentally both these measures free up traffic in the same stretch of Lordship Lane and hasten bus journey times, which are beneficial to anyone hoping to collect data that shows low impact of nearby LTNs.

I'm not disagreeing with this - but I'm pointing out that in terms of covid the council needs to take actions - it has, and so that might take longer to fix (eg ending social distancing). Whereas the bus stop should just be opened regardless of whether the barriers are removed.

The pavements outsides shops/businesses opposite closed bus stop have increased numbers of pavement tables and chairs.

If you remove some of these - there would be sufficient space for pedestrians and no need for the barriers. There was discussion recently by a health person on TV stating social distancing is being taken too literally by some people - the few seconds it takes to pass people in the street is unlikely to pass on covid. However, if people stop and talk or queue for shops etc then social distancing is essential. People were lining up for Roses' butchers along LL and down past the Picture House. This caused a bottleneck at the bus stop with those waiting for buses, those just walking past and the shopping queue. If they took the bus shelter way this would free up a little extra space.But we would of course lose the seats etc.


Having visited the Picture House last week for the first time since lockdown, I struggled with my arthritis to walk from the Post Office stop. Have spoken to several people who have membership at the picture House who have stated that the walk (and dodgy pavements)from Post Office had but them off seeing films. (These are mainly older folk and some with disabilities).

after 19 July the date the UK govt has decided the country will use the herd immunity idea to live with COVID.


Oh, come on - herd immunity? - Yes perhaps for the young (under 18s), where the chances of serious illness are very limited - but the vast majority of those older/ at risk are double vaccinated, and even more single vaccinated and on track for double. And they (the UK Govt via its agencies and advisors) are seriously considering the balance of risk in reducing vaccination age to 12. We will have to live with Covid like we live with flu. Southwark is surprisingly unvaccinated, of course, and you should be worrying whether it is mind-sets like yours (when you were a local influencer) which have discouraged vaccine take-up here.


Or do you want an Australian style permanent lock-down in the UK?

Thank you James - I do hope you're right. It's my nearest bus stop on Lordship Lane but I have quite a long walk to get to it, without the additional walk to the Post Office when I get there. I can't see how it helps with social distancing to have us additional bus passengers waiting outside the busy post office.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • maxxi maxes out. Week 8 points...   Week 8 table...  
    • You may have seen an article in the paper today about Jewish leaders and notables calling on the UN and world leaders to sanction Israel [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/oct/22/jewish-notables-open-letter-un-sanction-israel], "... Prominent Jewish figures around the world are calling on the United Nations and world leaders to impose sanctions on Israel over what they describe as “unconscionable” actions amounting to genocide in Gaza. Over 450 signatories, including former Israeli officials, Oscar winners, authors and intellectuals have signed an open letter demanding accountability over Israel’s conduct in Gaza, the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem. The letter’s release comes as EU leaders meet in Brussels on Thursday amid reports they plan to shelve proposals for sanctions over human rights violations. “We have not forgotten that so many of the laws, charters, and conventions established to safeguard and protect all human life were created in response to the Holocaust,” the signatories write. “Those safeguards have been relentlessly violated by Israel.” ..."   There is also a petition we can sign to support them in their call for justice: Direct link: https://secure.avaaz.org/campaign/en/stand_with_jews_demand_action_loc_cp1/?tUwBCsb&v=502713833&cl=22394973010&_checksum=7dc99acb5dd4fc5a43a24e21772f51005ea239753e9ae3033d9f79ffd6119559 "For the first time since the ceasefire, a powerful coalition of Jewish voices have come together, urging world leaders to keep the pressure up until real accountability and freedom are achieved.Their call can shift the political mood and give leaders courage to act decisively -- Amplify their voices and stand with them: The demands of Global Jewish Voices: To respect and abide by the decisions of the International Court of Justice, noting their application also in the West Bank and East Jerusalem; to apply arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court; and to resist efforts to unduly pressure and influence and prevent the workings of both courts. To refuse any complicity in continued crimes and violations of international law against Palestinians by Israel, including by ending the provision of arms and other relevant goods and services; to use relevant leverage, including targeted sanctions on governmental bodies and individuals responsible for violations of international law, and suspension of relations with commercial entities contributing to these violations. To ensure that humanitarian assistance reaches all Palestinians in Gaza at the scale that is commensurate to their vital need, that the blockade is lifted and materials for reconstruction enter, and that there is a full Israeli military withdrawal. To refute false accusations of antisemitism that abusively deploy our collective history to tarnish those with whom we stand together in the pursuit of peace and justice. If you are of Jewish heritage you can also sign here, and we will add the number of your voices to support the Jewish call for justice. Posted: 22 October 2025"  
    • I've actually met Luke Johnson and he's actually a very amicable, witty and extremely clever man. He's also created thousands of jobs and generated millions and millions of pounds of tax revenue for the government, offering goods and hospitality that countless millions of people have enjoyed over the decades. I'm not a fan of Gail's but I'm also not a fan of people who knock down good guys that have contributed a huge amount to this country.  Anyway, French Patisseries and southern hemisphere coffee don't belong on Farmer's markets. 
    • What mandatory action would then be required of them?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...