Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It used to be that the council would pay for vandalism on shop fronts/shutters (tags, etc.) to be cleaned off. Now, apparently, it does not.

Should it set money aside for this, or should businesses do it themselves? (Few do, unfortunately, even as retail needs a boost).

It is if the council is making an effort and spending money to improve things for retailers and shoppers alike. I doubt you?d prefer nothing to be done. More attractive streets mean more footfall and more spending, I?d say, which ought to encourage landlords or owners to make their properties look as welcoming as possible.

Sounds like a job for Boris? fluorescent-jacketed chain gangs.


In seriousness though I do think it?s a good idea. I?d rather have council money spent on that than on the various banners etc that they put up around the place.


ETA I wonder if there?s a way to apply for funding for this kind of thing out of the cleaner/ greener or neighbourhoods fund. Maybe through a small business association or something? The grants are structured so that independent organisations apply for funding rather than asking Southwark to do a task, I wonder if there?s a way around it. Maybe a residents assn, small business group or something set up to deal with local graffiti.

There was a thread on here, or perhaps buried in another thread, by a councillor about council efforts to help retail, hence my question. I do find it odd that businesses let their frontages look uninviting and ugly, especially after a massive downturn in high street shopping.

After cleaning you frontage a few times why would you waste more money when the idiots come back and do it again and again.


Perhaps they, the powers that be should capture a few of these people and make them clean it off with a toothbrush.


Pigs will, fly free tickets to Chessington World of Adventure is the likely outcome.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There was a thread on here, or perhaps buried in

> another thread, by a councillor about council

> efforts to help retail, hence my question. I do

> find it odd that businesses let their frontages

> look uninviting and ugly, especially after a

> massive downturn in high street shopping.


The Coop funeral business used to clean the side of their building every time and it was back within days

There's been a big "Ricky" there now for a while - maybe its not as bad as some so they left it being the better of two evils


TUPI Peckham has painted their shutters green and no graffiti for 7 days - wonder if it's special paint.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • The lady is called Janet 
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...