Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It used to be that the council would pay for vandalism on shop fronts/shutters (tags, etc.) to be cleaned off. Now, apparently, it does not.

Should it set money aside for this, or should businesses do it themselves? (Few do, unfortunately, even as retail needs a boost).

It is if the council is making an effort and spending money to improve things for retailers and shoppers alike. I doubt you?d prefer nothing to be done. More attractive streets mean more footfall and more spending, I?d say, which ought to encourage landlords or owners to make their properties look as welcoming as possible.

Sounds like a job for Boris? fluorescent-jacketed chain gangs.


In seriousness though I do think it?s a good idea. I?d rather have council money spent on that than on the various banners etc that they put up around the place.


ETA I wonder if there?s a way to apply for funding for this kind of thing out of the cleaner/ greener or neighbourhoods fund. Maybe through a small business association or something? The grants are structured so that independent organisations apply for funding rather than asking Southwark to do a task, I wonder if there?s a way around it. Maybe a residents assn, small business group or something set up to deal with local graffiti.

There was a thread on here, or perhaps buried in another thread, by a councillor about council efforts to help retail, hence my question. I do find it odd that businesses let their frontages look uninviting and ugly, especially after a massive downturn in high street shopping.

After cleaning you frontage a few times why would you waste more money when the idiots come back and do it again and again.


Perhaps they, the powers that be should capture a few of these people and make them clean it off with a toothbrush.


Pigs will, fly free tickets to Chessington World of Adventure is the likely outcome.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There was a thread on here, or perhaps buried in

> another thread, by a councillor about council

> efforts to help retail, hence my question. I do

> find it odd that businesses let their frontages

> look uninviting and ugly, especially after a

> massive downturn in high street shopping.


The Coop funeral business used to clean the side of their building every time and it was back within days

There's been a big "Ricky" there now for a while - maybe its not as bad as some so they left it being the better of two evils


TUPI Peckham has painted their shutters green and no graffiti for 7 days - wonder if it's special paint.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...