Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Interesting, they are married you know.


So are you saying married people don't or should have sex and children ?


Wow what an amazingly different place East Dulwich would be if that was the case!


Like him or loath him, as a married couple they are only doing what other married couples do..

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Interesting, they are married you know.

>

> So are you saying married people don't or should

> have sex and children ?

>

> Wow what an amazingly different place East Dulwich

> would be if that was the case!

>

> Like him or loath him, as a married couple they

> are only doing what other married couples do..



Boris has lost count of the number & whereabouts of all of his children. Do we really need more little Boris'? - rather like, do we really need more little Rees-Moggs??

I am not sure he remembers how many kids he has. By the way, if child support is only for the first two kids, but a man marries another woman and has two more, are those kids entitled to the child support? And then if the woman also goes on to have two more with another man, are those kids entitled to the child support? The point is, if one is rich they can breed all they like, but if one is poor and the child support stops after the first two..... and THROW that discussion bomb into this thread!

jazzer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> wordsworth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > He forgot the withdrawal agreement.

>

> Didn't you mean he forgot to withdraw at the

> critical moment?



Yup, sorry the vinegar stroke

We've got COP-26 which is a massive wake up call about reducing carbon emissions and avoiding the worst impacts of climate change. Overpopulation is one of the main factors.


Whilst I am not advocating the former Chinese approach our PM is not setting a great example.

teddyboy23 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Could be Hancock's excuse the pun



Hancock was photographed picking up his clothes from his old home - he wasn't even allowed in and the family dog was sitting near him looking really miserable.

I started this thread as a light hearted bit of fun and I think it's run its course as people are brining in Hancock which has nothing to do with Boris getting his misses up the duff. Unless of course Hancock dipped his wick there as well???


Admin as the originator, can we close this thread down now please.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Week 4 fixtures...   Saturday 13th September Arsenal v Nottingham Forest AFC Bournemouth v Brighton & Hove Albion Crystal Palace v Sunderland Everton v Aston Villa Fulham v Leeds United Newcastle United v Wolverhampton Wanderers West Ham United v Tottenham Hotspur Brentford v Chelsea   Sunday 14th September Burnley v Liverpool Manchester City v Manchester United
    • They are being taxed into oblivion.    a lot of them, previously fully subscribed (we'll call you, don't call us) are no advertising desperately for new pupils, even paying for those bulk junk mail drops.   
    • More dirt https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce845w70g0yo
    • This thread should be updated with a new title. "Is Keith Starmer Toast?"    I would say yes. This is as bad as when Boris Johnson ignored Chris Pincher's behaviour. And Starmer piled in very heavily on Johnson for that. If he doesn't resign himself now he is an enormous hypocrite and this will be very damaging  indeed.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...