Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Interesting, they are married you know.


So are you saying married people don't or should have sex and children ?


Wow what an amazingly different place East Dulwich would be if that was the case!


Like him or loath him, as a married couple they are only doing what other married couples do..

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Interesting, they are married you know.

>

> So are you saying married people don't or should

> have sex and children ?

>

> Wow what an amazingly different place East Dulwich

> would be if that was the case!

>

> Like him or loath him, as a married couple they

> are only doing what other married couples do..



Boris has lost count of the number & whereabouts of all of his children. Do we really need more little Boris'? - rather like, do we really need more little Rees-Moggs??

I am not sure he remembers how many kids he has. By the way, if child support is only for the first two kids, but a man marries another woman and has two more, are those kids entitled to the child support? And then if the woman also goes on to have two more with another man, are those kids entitled to the child support? The point is, if one is rich they can breed all they like, but if one is poor and the child support stops after the first two..... and THROW that discussion bomb into this thread!

jazzer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> wordsworth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > He forgot the withdrawal agreement.

>

> Didn't you mean he forgot to withdraw at the

> critical moment?



Yup, sorry the vinegar stroke

We've got COP-26 which is a massive wake up call about reducing carbon emissions and avoiding the worst impacts of climate change. Overpopulation is one of the main factors.


Whilst I am not advocating the former Chinese approach our PM is not setting a great example.

teddyboy23 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Could be Hancock's excuse the pun



Hancock was photographed picking up his clothes from his old home - he wasn't even allowed in and the family dog was sitting near him looking really miserable.

I started this thread as a light hearted bit of fun and I think it's run its course as people are brining in Hancock which has nothing to do with Boris getting his misses up the duff. Unless of course Hancock dipped his wick there as well???


Admin as the originator, can we close this thread down now please.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...