Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Don't some places legally allow you to 'abandon' your baby in a babyhatch? Not legal in the UK. The US has safe-haven laws for infant abandonment, but as one couple discovered some years ago, these laws do not extend to abandoning your teenagers. (But hey it's the thought that counts anyway, right?)


More recently these parents got in serious trouble for trying to ditch their 6-yo. http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Couple-Tried-to-Abandon-6-Year-Old-at-Police-Station-Cops-116735219.html But, oh they said they just wanted to "teach her a lesson". Hmmm.

treehugger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't even know where the nearest police station

> is any more. I hear LL PS is beign turned into a

> Waitrose.


Ooo, will they let you abandon children there? Maybe they'd give you a discount on groceries, like a trade-in scheme?

Well, something has been bugging me for a while....


Question: Why is British society so not child-friendly?


And I'm not talking about whether or note there is a baby change facility. I'm talking about the general vibe that children are "tolerated" if they sit still and behave, but not cherished unless they are your own. Now, I'm not one in favour of kids running riot in cafes either - which means that usually I don't take my kids anywhere other than the park, the woods etc. But just now and again we do have to venture out into society. So last weekend I had to go to return a skirt to a shop in ED (can't go during the week as working, and hubby works weekends, so they had to come). So, whilst I don't approve of dragging bored kids round shops, it should have taken 10 minutes and we would go to the swings on the way back. Cue extremely unfriendly, disapproving shop assistant, looking down her nose at hassled mother trying on a new skirt whilst trying also to keep kids from mucking about...and pretty much failing on all fronts. I left the shop almost in tears and vowing never ever again!


now, maybe I am just a sensitive soul, but it struck me as I trudged home that in other places in the world (I'm thinking of Spain, where mr canela is from and where I had little ones, and other Latin countries I've been to) that shop assistant would have smiled at the kids, and most likely talked and engaged them so that I could try that bloomin' skirt on! and she would have smiled at me too.


that's one little example, but every parent has their own story. not to mention all the posts on the EDF - my particular favourite being the people complaining about school children singing on the top of the bus in the morning!


so, yes, i usually keep my kids far and away from where they might cause offence. but my point is that surely it is sad that children are so unwelcome everywhere...


that controversial enough Otta?

That's a good start Canela! As it stands I wholeheartedly agree with you and wish there was more societal tolerating, wow even cherishing, going on. It would make life so much more pleasant... I love going abroad where the culture is much more as you describe (pre-children I loved the family-friendly attitude in Spain, Italy and Greece and since having a baby experienced much more toleration in the US and Turkish Cyprus that at home..) there are amazing exceptions and I think on an individual level Brits do adore babies, but on a societal level even babies are seen as an inconvenience to many and liable to turn into, whisper, children!!
I was telling my mediterranean relatives that we have been invited to a wedding where children are not allowed, and they were very entertained by the notion. In the last 18 months we have been invited to five wedding so far where children not invited, and one of the weddings was of a couple who are very devoted Christians too, so go figure!

Saffron Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't some places legally allow you to 'abandon'

> your baby in a babyhatch? Not legal in the UK.

> The US has safe-haven laws for infant abandonment,

> but as one couple discovered some years ago, these

> laws do not extend to abandoning your teenagers.

> (But hey it's the thought that counts anyway,

> right?)

>

> More recently these parents got in serious trouble

> for trying to ditch their 6-yo.

> http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Couple-Tried-

> to-Abandon-6-Year-Old-at-Police-Station-Cops-11673

> 5219.html But, oh they said they just wanted to

> "teach her a lesson". Hmmm.



I believe this is still happens in Germany (if memory serves).

I took baby Pickle to a playgroup this morning that we've been to a few times now and I love it. Generally I detest playgroups (mainly as I have older children and can't really be bothered spending time in a room with other peoples older children!), but this one is refreshing.


I was thinking about it on the way home - I enjoyed it because

- it was not pretentious in the slightest. No rice cakes, organic juice. Custard creams and sugary drinks.

- the few kids behaving inappropriately were disciplined

- it was cheap

- no puppets, structure, or adult intervention in terms of what the kids could do. Just lots of well loved toys and a nice big safe space where the kids could get on with it.

- the adults were friendly.


Interestingly, the majority of adults there were childminders. They are a very welcoming, down to earth bunch of ladies. I'm thick skinned and am at the point in my life where I don't really care whether people speak to me or not when I'm at groups with my baby, but this particular group is a refreshing exception to the norm in these parts.


Not really a heated debate topic, but my musings on life for today ;-)

Good work canela, although not really controversial, more sport on.


One reason Pizza Express is always packed is because the staff are usually lovely with kids, as are the gruff and sometimes scary looking blokes in your average kebab shop. When we took our then 9 month old daughter to Venezuella for a friend's wedding, and stayed with the family, they absolutely adored her, and there was no question of trying to keep her out of everyone's way.


In the UK, I think we live a generally too fast paced and stressfull lifestyle, and part of that means that we don't have the patience to deal with kids.

Do unfriendly, stuck-up, non-helpful shop assistants really have anything to do with children though? Seriously, British shop assistants are infamous for being surly and snobbish. Hmm, admittedly if you have children in tow, then it can be all the more unpleasant. However I've generally found people more engaging since I've had my daugher. Children can be an 'ice breaker' with strangers. Maybe it's the British sense of reserve that keeps people from interacting or being more tolerant of children? Interestingly, the 'stiff up lip' has been recognised by some as a relatively recent phenomenon.

well, it sounds like you just had a grumpy shop assistant there, canela, which is crap whatever your situation (try shopping in Peckham, we have a special level of miserable shop assistants all the time). I don't know why it is, hangover from the past (children seen and not heard) maybe, or living in a stupidly expensive, overcrowded city makes people less tolerant all round - there's a couple of possibilites. I completely agree that society's attitude to the elderly is far far worse than to children.


don't you find the fasmily room to be generally ruck-free - everyone's very nicely behaved, aren't they? Not like over in the General section, where it can get entertainingly punchy. If you posted (as someone did today) a question about toddler groups or something that's been covered before in General it would take 3 minutes for 10 people to pile in pointing out where the search function is, hasn't this been done a billion times before blah blah - over here everyone mildly mentions what groups they like until someone points the OP in the direction of ED Tots.


anyway - SAHP vs WOHP? Anyone?

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Come on, breast vs bottle, Gina Ford, breast

> feeding etiquette in public, kids in pubs, kids on

> buses.

>

> Come on, I need entertainment, lets have a ruck!



You left out homeopathy, immunisations, food additives, and free schools.

"don't you find the fasmily room to be generally ruck-free"


For the most part yes (which is why I visit less often ;-)), but there have been some classic moments!


Regarding the elderly, I think the majority of people have respect for the elderly. It can however be grating when constantly told "it was better in my day, you don't know you were born!"... Okay, so I haven't survived a World War, sorry about that.

Ooo, recent controversial statements I have overheard, wanted to debate, but really couldn't (without interrupting a conversation between various different strangers) include:


What's the point in having kids if you (ie, the mother) are going to work full time/return to work within 6 months, etc etc.


Harrow (school) is worth every penny of advantage it is buying my son.


It's like X (the nanny) is the mum and she (the working mother) is the husband.


I would never let my child do that (re child acting out in store).


The rich don't deserve child benefit.


My daughter (3) didn't get into JAPS and I'm devastated.


(On woman's hour) Working mothers neglect their husbands: the new Gina Ford type guide that directs women how to tend their partners after children come along.


Hmmm, there are about a million more but not necessarily family related.


Men get less support at work to father, than women get to mother.


Don't know if any of that takes your fancy, Otta?

How about you all confess to how many times you've chosen your own convenience over the collective good e.g. let's send LO to nursery in a polo neck jumper and hope the staff don?t notice the chicken pox/impetigo/other infectious disease that LO has but is not unduly affected by?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So you are justifying building on the green belt, in Londons case "the lungs of London" which will causes harm to natures ability to turn co2 into o2? 
    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...