Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is anyone else bored at best, at worst pretty annoyed, by the latest expression of "disappointment" from St James' Palace over sunny pictures of the "Cambridge Three" (him, her and the wee bump) on an exclusive beach, in swimsuits, being - shock horror - printed in an Italian glossy?


Chi magazine is not exactly my cup of tea: I prefer the FT. And I realise this might be an unpopular view. But it bewilders me that the "expectation of privacy" of the Cambridges - or any other ridiculously wealthy and privileged person - should be treated as a newsworthy topic by the BBC. And while I have no interest in viewing the pictures myself, I find the obscuring of the "offending" shots on BBC images of the Chi front page as, well, just silly.


Hgrumf!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/29128-the-royal-fuss-snore/
Share on other sites

Scottish grandmother. Who would have disapproved of topless photos too. But would have laughed at the idea that anybody should have a legally enforceable "expectation" entitling her to take her top off under gods own sunshine without anyone other than her husband and a few servants seeing her xxxxxxxx. (Scottish word for breasts.)

It is only the British Press who have the gentleman's agreement with Buck House not to take the piss and this wasn't even taking the piss, she was on a public beach and photographed by a member of the public who then passed the pix on (sold them?) to the Italian media etc.


I don't care whether or not these pix are published but no showy off bumpy in bikini = no pix. And I don't even think she was arsed about it but that it was blown up out of proportion by British Media who wouldn't use the pix. However, too funny that high and mighty British tv, always quick to snipe at the tabloids, paps, stills photogs, gossip mags etc goofed up when Eamonn Holmes showed the pix on This Morning - Doh!


On a slightly diff matter, I do think that despite all the rumours Prince Harry does look too much like Prince Phillip for them to be true.


Other than that I don't give a toss about the royals :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • The lady is called Janet 
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...