Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is anyone else bored at best, at worst pretty annoyed, by the latest expression of "disappointment" from St James' Palace over sunny pictures of the "Cambridge Three" (him, her and the wee bump) on an exclusive beach, in swimsuits, being - shock horror - printed in an Italian glossy?


Chi magazine is not exactly my cup of tea: I prefer the FT. And I realise this might be an unpopular view. But it bewilders me that the "expectation of privacy" of the Cambridges - or any other ridiculously wealthy and privileged person - should be treated as a newsworthy topic by the BBC. And while I have no interest in viewing the pictures myself, I find the obscuring of the "offending" shots on BBC images of the Chi front page as, well, just silly.


Hgrumf!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/29128-the-royal-fuss-snore/
Share on other sites

Scottish grandmother. Who would have disapproved of topless photos too. But would have laughed at the idea that anybody should have a legally enforceable "expectation" entitling her to take her top off under gods own sunshine without anyone other than her husband and a few servants seeing her xxxxxxxx. (Scottish word for breasts.)

It is only the British Press who have the gentleman's agreement with Buck House not to take the piss and this wasn't even taking the piss, she was on a public beach and photographed by a member of the public who then passed the pix on (sold them?) to the Italian media etc.


I don't care whether or not these pix are published but no showy off bumpy in bikini = no pix. And I don't even think she was arsed about it but that it was blown up out of proportion by British Media who wouldn't use the pix. However, too funny that high and mighty British tv, always quick to snipe at the tabloids, paps, stills photogs, gossip mags etc goofed up when Eamonn Holmes showed the pix on This Morning - Doh!


On a slightly diff matter, I do think that despite all the rumours Prince Harry does look too much like Prince Phillip for them to be true.


Other than that I don't give a toss about the royals :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...