Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Watched lots of news coverage today, even ITV, a rarity, to get their take on it. Trying to read round a little on why it all happened so quickly and one theory is that the Taliban negotiated with the army for their safe passage if they laid down their arms. It would be interesting to get others' perspectives on what comes over as a dreadful situation and wasted Western investment in terms of both money and lives (not ignoring the much great loss of Afghans). The last 20 years have not led to popular support of a democratic regime.


Two useful articles that appear to go beyond our mainstream TV coverage


Poltico https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/08/16/afghanistan-history-taliban-collapse-504977


NT Times https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/13/world/asia/afghanistan-rapid-military-collapse.html

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/291741-afghanistan/
Share on other sites

It's a big ugly, no easy-wins situation, with horrific consequences currently unfolding


I don't think blaming Biden for implementing the deal Trump did twith he Taliban is quite the gotcha people who make the comment think it is. I'm not absolving Biden of anything - but let's not pretend Trump would somehow be doing better

yep - but then we go back to the fundamentals of this whole venture. Should we have gone in the first place? How long do we commit to staying? After 20 years do you just say "well, forever if necessary?".


If our problem is the way a country treats it's women are we going to tackle other big countries? Of course not


What the UK can do now (now that it was ignored in this) the one thing it is sovereign over, is decide how it treats refugees from Afghanistan - and that's not looking good is it?

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sleepy Joe seems to have slept through much of

> this. Our lot were half awake on the beach.


Or he did know and allowed it to happen (an election is 3.5 years away - he may have decided to get it over with).


CNN said he wanted out after a conversation with (frustratingly I missed the who here)

We seem to have known anyway and this whole article about withdrawal was written in April.


"At meetings of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in Brussels on March 23 and 24, Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken sought to put allies on notice that they should start thinking about how to conduct withdrawals of their own troops in Afghanistan, a combat disengagement that the Pentagon describes as a ?military retrograde operation.? "


https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/17/us/politics/biden-afghanistan-withdrawal.html

Early days to tell if Afghanistan wont be a base for international terrorists.

Clearly Islamic / Sharia law is alien to western values.

Equally taking the 2001 theocracy through to resilient democracy would take circa 100 years if history is anything to go by.

US has lost over 6,000 people killed in Afghanistan. Nearly half military, remainder contractors mostly for security. Over 20,000 seriously injured. And spent over a trillion USD.

What is amazing is that the US / NATO didn't leave well over a decade ago.


What may be hopeful is Taliban leadership living in rich Middle East states for most of the last 20 years. They've enjoyed more modern life styles - TV, mobiles, internet, security and freedoms. Id be amazed if they return Afghanistan back to the 2001 they were deposed from. Or that the 38 million citizens of Afghanistan having experienced the huge economic and social uplift of the last 20 years wish to return to 2001.

Equally 22% of Afghan GDP is currently from foreign aid almost exclusively the west.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • The lady is called Janet 
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...