Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As some people will be aware there has been some discussion in various council meetings about the council?s seeming inability to keep track of whether developers are complying with their contracted obligations to provide social and affordable housing, and for how long the housing stays affordable. The council paid a couple of hundred thousand for an IT system to do this several years ago but there?s no sign of a working system


Campaign group https://www.35percent.org/ seem to have been digging on this and I?ve just seen an FOI response online that people might be interested in - at https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/information_about_the_monitoring#incoming-1849828


Not the initial response (where the council failed to provide the relevant info), but the one given after a request for review - scroll down to the 6 August response.


Here?s a summary by a council officer as at Jan 2020


?Following our call on Friday afternoon, below is a summary of the situation with the AH monitoring

project.


2016 - Southwark made several promises after the Ombudsman found that were had failed to properly

monitor AH.

2017 - An audit of 11,999 properties found that it was not possible to link the newly created addresses of

properties held by housing associations and the council, with the reference on historic planning applications

and legal agreements.

2018 ? Planning department agreed to procure the services of an agency to help design and develop an AH

monitoring service. This was delayed for 12 months following the award of contract.

1

2019 - The research outlined why it will never be possible to link existing properties with historic planning

records - there is a disconnect between the planning and the physical / build world. Dxw and I designed and

developed a service to resolve this issue and handed it over to the council in December 2019.

2021 - This service still has not been used by the planning department.

2016 - 2021 - Five years on, we are still not monitoring AH, as promised.


This delay has now been picked up by the 35% campaign, councillors and the housing scrutiny committee.


....


Further delay is likely to result in increased interest from the 35% campaign and the media (local news and

journals such as Inside Housing), and most likely a second complaint to the ombudsman (we would be in no

position to justify the five year delay and I understand that a repeat offence carries a harsher penalty).


Last year we won a number awards and good press for this work, to not be using the service that we paid

?230kof public money for would be embarrassing for both the department and council.

Additional embarrassment will come from spending further public money, persisting to try and do this in a

way that we have proved, categorically, doesn?t work. ?


There are subsequent emails regarding potential ways forward, which involve a trade off between inadequate historical data, risk of human error and much more cost, as far as I can tell.


What a mess.

This article, found following the Jam Factory reference, provides some useful background to the perceived need for Affordable Housing monitoring. https://www.insidehousing.co.uk/insight/insight/the-court-battles-over-section-106-delivery--56141. What, btw, is 'staircasing'?

Interesting 2019 presentation from the project team at

https://www.southwark.gov.uk/assets/attach/11530/alpha-report.pdf. These guys don?t seem to be the problem. What concerns me is that there is a big problem (in Southwark and elsewhere) in tracking this stuff, while councils use developers? potentially unfulfilled promises as firm evidence of achievement of social housing goals.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you for the detailed advise @trinidad It is definitely damage we are concerned about. I don’t think Evri would agree to pay the bill to fix our gate or letter box if they were to be damaged as a result of their delivery drivers helper. Our doorbell can be heard from outside when rung so we don’t quite believe the aggressive simultaneous door/letter box banging is necessary. It can be quite a shock it is done very aggressively.  I’ll definitely action the steps you’ve kindly provided along with a phone call tomorrow. I do sympathise with the role drivers have and how busy they are, which is why we tried communicating directly with her but sadly we haven’t succeeded 
    • What outcome would you like? Disciplinary action? Not to have the driver back? Retraining? I know there is alot of pressure on drivers to deliver within a set day. if he slams the gate, is it evidence he is causing damage, or is the noise a irritant to yourself? You could put a sign up or buy a signing asking to close the gate gentle???? can you hear the door bell from the door? he might be ringing, not hearing and therefore knocking. In trhe notes section of the be livery page, there is a note section, although there is not 100 per cent these notes would be read as these drivers are constantly rushing.  I did a google search for you, i found this and you can try the envri website Contact Us | Evri   To complain to Evri, you can follow these steps: Contact Customer Service: Call Evri's customer service at 0330 808 5456 for assistance with your complaint.    1 Write a Letter: Address your complaint to Capitol House, 1 Capitol Close, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 0WH.    1 Use the Official Website: Visit the Evri complaints page on their official website for detailed instructions on how to submit a complaint.    2 Email or Call for Specific Issues: For issues like missing or damaged parcels, you can email or call 0800 988 8888, which is free to call.    1 These methods will help you effectively communicate your concerns to Evri.   My driver is called anthony, he is brilliant to be honest. I cant fault him.
    • When I have more time and energy, I will look up the actual number of votes cast for each party in that election, rather than the number of seats won. I'm interested to see that you apparently  think that  Boris Johnson did a good job of "leading the country through Covid." Is your memory really that short? I won't stoop to calling Johnson and his cronies names in the way that you seem to think is appropriate for left wing politicians. At least the left wing politicians have some semblance of morals and a concern for people who aren't in some over privileged inner circle and/or raking in money for themselves on the back of an epidemic. I'm not going to open a can of worms on here  by commenting on the disgraceful so called "purge". 
    • Can’t imagine what it must be like you have your doorbell rung harshly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...