Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As some people will be aware there has been some discussion in various council meetings about the council?s seeming inability to keep track of whether developers are complying with their contracted obligations to provide social and affordable housing, and for how long the housing stays affordable. The council paid a couple of hundred thousand for an IT system to do this several years ago but there?s no sign of a working system


Campaign group https://www.35percent.org/ seem to have been digging on this and I?ve just seen an FOI response online that people might be interested in - at https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/information_about_the_monitoring#incoming-1849828


Not the initial response (where the council failed to provide the relevant info), but the one given after a request for review - scroll down to the 6 August response.


Here?s a summary by a council officer as at Jan 2020


?Following our call on Friday afternoon, below is a summary of the situation with the AH monitoring

project.


2016 - Southwark made several promises after the Ombudsman found that were had failed to properly

monitor AH.

2017 - An audit of 11,999 properties found that it was not possible to link the newly created addresses of

properties held by housing associations and the council, with the reference on historic planning applications

and legal agreements.

2018 ? Planning department agreed to procure the services of an agency to help design and develop an AH

monitoring service. This was delayed for 12 months following the award of contract.

1

2019 - The research outlined why it will never be possible to link existing properties with historic planning

records - there is a disconnect between the planning and the physical / build world. Dxw and I designed and

developed a service to resolve this issue and handed it over to the council in December 2019.

2021 - This service still has not been used by the planning department.

2016 - 2021 - Five years on, we are still not monitoring AH, as promised.


This delay has now been picked up by the 35% campaign, councillors and the housing scrutiny committee.


....


Further delay is likely to result in increased interest from the 35% campaign and the media (local news and

journals such as Inside Housing), and most likely a second complaint to the ombudsman (we would be in no

position to justify the five year delay and I understand that a repeat offence carries a harsher penalty).


Last year we won a number awards and good press for this work, to not be using the service that we paid

?230kof public money for would be embarrassing for both the department and council.

Additional embarrassment will come from spending further public money, persisting to try and do this in a

way that we have proved, categorically, doesn?t work. ?


There are subsequent emails regarding potential ways forward, which involve a trade off between inadequate historical data, risk of human error and much more cost, as far as I can tell.


What a mess.

This article, found following the Jam Factory reference, provides some useful background to the perceived need for Affordable Housing monitoring. https://www.insidehousing.co.uk/insight/insight/the-court-battles-over-section-106-delivery--56141. What, btw, is 'staircasing'?

Interesting 2019 presentation from the project team at

https://www.southwark.gov.uk/assets/attach/11530/alpha-report.pdf. These guys don?t seem to be the problem. What concerns me is that there is a big problem (in Southwark and elsewhere) in tracking this stuff, while councils use developers? potentially unfulfilled promises as firm evidence of achievement of social housing goals.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The SE22 Evri delivery family are lovely, and always say hello wherever we spot them in the area. We gave them a box of chocolates during Covid as they were working their socks off at Christmas
    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...