Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
As it goes past a school, LBS could apply the Village approach and stop all car traffic during school rush hours, especially as it is a side street and cars can use many other routes including LL and CPR. But that doesn?t apply in ED of course ?.
  • 2 months later...
The tree pits on Cyrena, near to the 5 Month Zebra Crossing, are tatty and full of dog crud, so I have emailed the tree section at the council asking them to clean and plant soonest. If you are a dog owner, don't think that because it is a patch of soil that you can leave pooch poo there - you shouldn't because it is tacky and unsanitary. If I catch you I'll rub your nose in it!
That whole area has a problem with dog poo, there?s clearly someone who walks that patch regularly and feels at liberty to leave their mess behind. It?s all up Fellbrigg too. Apparently spraying it with a brightly coloured spray paint puts some people off doing it (eco, temporary stuff of course).

Hi all,


The crossing on Whateley Road was a project that I worked on with parents and governors from Harris and Heber School. It's there to make the school run safer for children from both schools. Until reading this thread, I'd only ever received positive feedback on it. If there are any issues please let me know and I will see what I can do.


As for dog mess, if there are areas with a particular problem please email me at [email protected] and I can look into getting it sorted.


Best wishes

James

It took ages to be installed and then when the workmen arrived, there were long delays. I am sure it was worth the wait, just about, but I would prefer the trees/plants to be planted up as part of one big task. They are a right mess and people will just think they're there to let their dogs crap in and/or a place for fly tipping.

It?s awful walking along that side of Whateley Rd nice you cross over from Fellbrigg side. So much dog poo along the middle of the path, most days when taking my child to school, I?m having to dodge poo with buggy and small child. I?ve seen countless times children running along and straight into the poo, not realising and becoming extremely upset. It?s not nice having to them go to school and clean your shoes.


It?s does appear very deliberate, the dog owners fully aware school nearby and lots of kids, buggies, scooters, people rushing along that footpath.


Shame on you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...