Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Lynne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I went to the Crystal Rd practice at 8.00 this

> morning only to be told that they didn't accept

> face to face bookings, I had to ring. No-one had

> ever mentioned this to me before on either of my

> attempts to get an appointment. So I stood there

> and she reluctantly booked me a telephone

> appointment. This info. must have come as a

> surprise to the people queuing up behind me too.

> no wonder one has to sit so long at the phone if

> that's the only way you can get seen.



But surely it's because they are trying to minimise face to face contact in the present Covid situation?


Certainly the policy should be better communicated, but it's completely understandable, surely?

We are told there are simply not enough GPs to cater for everyone.


On that basis an online system makes sense but if it is sensitive information this will put people off going this route, I'd think.


I guess scenarios like having a backache that won't go is okay but others not. Plus, in terms of practice small print and shared care records, who can access this info, where is it kept etc...


Bear this in mind https://www.totalhealth.co.uk/blog/nhs-patients-given-until-23rd-june-prevent-sharing-their-medical-records


Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You can go online to book an appointment with

> minimum effort and little time spent. You fill in

> all the usual details and then are prompted to

> write your ailment, etc. You then get a message

> back saying you have an appointment later that day

> or the following day. It may not work for all

> patients all the time but in this case, and in

> others, I have found it easy and worthwhile (so

> saying it is ridiculous for one patient doesn't

> paint the whole picture, however irksome that is

> for the person for whom it failed).

Pugwash Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Go to the surgery, when you get to near the front

> of the queue, ring them on your phone!!!!



And then prove how long it takes to get through... if ever. ;-)

The system is in crisis.


I know a number of GP's. They all work for their own practices and not GP companies with multiple practices.

They work their socks off. One goes to work 5am every Saturday to work on the huge volume of paperwork each practice has these days before seeing patients. Two are retiring early 50's due to the pressure.


The system GP's work within is broken. Some making fortune by not focusing on patients and creating GP groups of practices the DMC"s of this world. The ones worried about serving patients well are being flattened and squished. Some are then giving up and selling out to those mega GP groups which increasingly are US owned. Many find it hard now to enjoy work feeling constantly they're not being allowed to do the best for their patients. Fortunately they still get some satisfaction from making enough people better to stick at it.


I read that GP's now have 20% more patients on their lists. And this is from more UK people and fewer doctors wanting to be GP's. Most GP's don't want so many patients or admin.

Lynne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I went to the Crystal Rd practice at 8.00 this

> morning only to be told that they didn't accept

> face to face bookings, I had to ring. No-one had

> ever mentioned this to me before on either of my

> attempts to get an appointment. So I stood there

> and she reluctantly booked me a telephone

> appointment. This info. must have come as a

> surprise to the people queuing up behind me too.

> no wonder one has to sit so long at the phone if

> that's the only way you can get seen.


It does say on their website not to come in unless you have been asked to. As far as I am aware this is the same for all local practices, everything is done by phone or online & if the gp needs to see you face to face they then give you an appointment to come in.

Dimelda Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To Callie: Not quite correct. At the practice I

> use (in Clapham), patients without an appointment

> can still walk into the practice. It would seem

> that some practices are different from others.



Clapham isn't local to the people in East Dulwich using this forum, though, so I think Callie may well be correct.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...