Jump to content

Problem with posting on the forum?


Sue

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure whether any part of the 'unwelcome word rejection' software here still silently blocks the posting, as it used to. You might try the test of pasting the full text into a post here — maybe even just editing your OP — to see if that gets the same treatment. If it does you could titrate your message, systematically adding or removing bits, until you discover an offending instance, which you can then try doctoring into acceptability. The incremental mode is preferable if multiple offensiveness is suspected.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I've reworded it loads of times and I still can't post it.


This is it:


Adidas_guy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I received electronic proof of delivery from Royal

> Mail which says a parcel was delivered to me at

> 13:54 today and apparently I signed for it?.

> However it was not delivered.



Royal Mail must then show you your signature!


But I thought even Royal Mail took photos these days?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Siduhe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue, try it without ?Adidas? - I may be completely

> off track but I seem to remember a load of spam

> trainer ads a while back. I wonder if that is a

> banned word?



That's weird, because it's their user name!


I will try! But why would it be OK in this part of the forum and not in others?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because the banned keywords only apply in the forums that the spammers frequent from memory. I don't think a banned keyword would prevent someone using it in a username, only typing it into the posting box and posting it.


And some of the words are really random - kitchen was banned for a while - but it's all about trying to keep the forum spam free, so I'm grateful!


Glad to hear my memory isn't failing me after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The block seems to have just been removed. I was experimenting with editing the username into posts on various boards. It wasn't possible on the ED Issues less than half an hour ago, now it is. And on the Lounge. Before that the only hits across the forum when searching for Adidas_guy were all just his own posts. He seems to have been deprived of his human right to be trolled, insulted or misunderstood for at least two years.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The block seems to have just been removed. I was

> experimenting with editing the username into posts

> on various boards. It wasn't possible on the ED

> Issues less than half an hour ago, now it is. And

> on the Lounge. Before that the only hits across

> the forum when searching for Adidas_guy were all

> just his own posts. He seems to have been

> deprived of his human right to be trolled,

> insulted or misunderstood for at least two years.



He must have found it really odd that nobody ever responded to him!


I hope he isn't permanently psychologically damaged!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Noted. I wasn't quite sure from their material whether the 'ad lib' supply by pharmacists had to be mandated; hence the suggestion to check.  There are plenty of individual manufacturers of generic methylphenidate, probably quite a bit cheaper too.  I'm afraid I didn't see radnrach's "can't really take an alternative", so apologies for presuming otherwise.  For myself I'm generally willing to trust that any manufacturer's offering of, say, 27 mg methylphenidate hydrochloride tabs, would contain that, and I'm not too worried about the minor quirks of things like their slow-release technology. I think it's likely that the medicines Serious Shortage Protocol does definitely give pharmacists some degrees of freedom. But it's apparently not in operation here. See the Minister's recent reply to a written question: https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-11-13/1660#.   , which seems to approximate to: we can't apply the shortage protocol here because the drugs are in short supply.
    • I'm not sure pharmacists have any discretion to alter specific medication prescriptions, although they can choose supplier where a generic is prescribed which may be offered by more than one company. This will only be for older medicines which are effectively 'out of copyright' . They can't issue alternatives on their own authority as they don't know what counter-indications there may be for specific patients. GPs may prescribe a specific supplier of a generic medicine where, for instance, they know patients have an adverse reaction to e.g. the medicine casings, so the Nottinghamshire directive to specify only generics where available may not always be helpful. 
    • I see that in Nottinghamshire the local NHS Area Prescribing Committee is recommending that prescriptions should be for generic methylphenidate, giving their pharmacists the option of supplying any brand (or presumably a generic product). https://www.nottsapc.nhs.uk/media/bw5df5pu/methylphenidate-pil.pdf It might be worth checking with your local pharmacist(s) to see whether this will help them if, as I suppose would be necessary, your GP issues a replacement prescription. I'll have a look around our local NHS websites now, to see if I can find anything there.  Nottingham, btw, provide more information, nominally for clinicians, at https://www.nottsapc.nhs.uk/media/vwxjkaxa/adhd-medicines-supply-advice.pdf.  And at https://www.nottsapc.nhs.uk/adhd-shortages/.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...