Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Looks like they're funding it already or presumably would have had to close down, so may as well:


", have resulted in Southwark Council funding the borough?s leisure provision until the end of its contract with Everyone Active."


Oh well, at least all those PCNs have been put to good use I guess...

The staff are good, though and I hope they manage to stay employed.


I would imagine those directly employed will be covered by TUPE. However those coming in as 'free' contractors - to take classes for instance, but not directly employed - and for whom Everyone Active does not pay employer's NI contributions - won't be covered by TUPE. Unless Southwark massively changes 'the offer' to clients however I would expect those roles to remain.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They are letting it run down, and have been for a

> while. The cardio machine monitors don't link to

> TV or YouTube, as proclaimed on the screen, for

> example. The staff are good, though and I hope

> they manage to stay employed.


agree with your comments on both counts.

Its a disaster for me because I joined the gym because EA also run the centres in Westminster which is where I work and therefore can use gyms after work. Otherwise I'm stuck to only going on days off.

I know they're open until 10pm but getting home from work at 8.30 from W1 THEN changing and going to the gym is going to be a pain.

Also council run gyms tend to be pretty rubbish.

We have no decent Virgin active type offering in the area so we're a bit stuck if the leisure centre goes downhill.

I am not surprised to hear this - the gym in Camberwell suffers from no equipment being replaced, lazy and disinterested staff never bothering to be in the gym (I've raised several times concerns that the gym is unstaffed) and at times I have real security concerns - particularly after being threatened by an individual who acted so aggressively to me that the police had to be called by a private personal trainer due to the lack of any staff.


I won't miss EA in anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • On the nostalgia side, I don't think anything can replace the clatter of the metal crates and the whirr of the milk float making its short hops.  Spartacus wrote: >Blimey Sue  >That was a rough neighbourhood if the birds were nicking your bottles. 😅 Which leads precariously to even more nostalgia here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/446783695525873/posts/2409887992548757/
    • I highly recommend anyone wanting to learn manual driving to use Nicholas Driving academy, great instructor who makes things easy to learn while being calm and fun reducing stress. Highly recommend!
    • I view this as a bit of unnecessary political point scoring. I mean, it's not as if she has more important things on her mind. She should get a rap on the knuckles but resignation? I don't think so. Quite how the Tories have the temerity to point fingers after the shambles and outright corruption that took place over Covid, I really don't know.
    • I did check that Tesco were the applicants on at least one of the 7 May forms.  I would be interested to know what Monica has seen.  Possibly some other formal annnouncement somewhere, or the LL traders' grapevine (which I'd guess is generally reliable)?  I wondered if it might have been a licensing matter, but don't see any mention in the licensing sub-committee's 16 October meeting agenda. In the meantime, I'm not even assuming that Tesco are taking the lease.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...