Jump to content

Part time nanny wanted


smjd169

Recommended Posts

Swedish/British family looking for a part time (3-4 days per week Tues-Fri) nanny for our bubbly 20 month old daughter. 8.30/9 - 6pm (approx) with some pick ups of our eldest daughter (4 yrs old)from a local nursery. Availability for occasional evening babysitting would be a bonus. We live in SE22 between East Dulwich and Forest Hill. To start asap.


Please drop me a DM for more info.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/294665-part-time-nanny-wanted/
Share on other sites

Hi my name is Tekisha I?m 30 years old and a registered child carer from south east London.

I have worked with children for over ten years and worked in various childcare settings such as nurseries a school and after-school club and also as a nanny for several years with wonderful families.

I am gentle, kind and encouraging and understand that children learn and develop at different paces and need different things.

Sadly i am leaving my current family as they are moving house so I am looking for a new family to join at the end of October preferably between the hours of 8.30/6.30 covering a minimum of 30 hours. This position sounds amazing, I would love to discuss this role further with you if I seem like the right person to help your little one/ones develop.

My email is [email protected] and my number is 07930 557329

Thank you for reading.

Tekisha C.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...