Jump to content

WaterHelp bills for unmetered single with low income


Recommended Posts

If you're a single occupier and a water meter cannot be fitted (TW does a survey), make sure you are on the single occupier tariff. If you are on a low income with disability/chronic illness there may be other help available:


https://www.thameswater.co.uk/help/account-and-billing/understand-your-bill/unmetered-customers

My wife and me have a two bedroom flat and our total bill for last year with a water meter was ?303.70, this equates to ?25.31 per month. I believe ?40.00 per month is much much higher than it should be.Your annual bill of ?480.00 per annum is extortionate. I would insist that you get Thames Water to install a meter.

If you look at https://www.thameswater.co.uk/help/water-meters/getting-a-water-meter you'll see plans for compulsory installation of meters anyway. So perhaps time to jump in now and get whatever benefit sooner?


They seem to have more flexible plans now for installing meters in difficult locations. I remember, last time I checked, that if they're not able to install one, you got charged at a notional use rate, that could, eg if you're a lone occupant, be lower than the current one. Does anyone have knowledge or experience of this still happening? At present they're non-committal about alternatives, and say in answer to the question about previous inability to install a meter just "When our smart meter programme reaches you, we?ll do a survey as normal and then let you know the next steps."

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does anyone have knowledge or experience of this still happening?


Yes, I phoned Thames Water after seeing IlonaM's post above as I had no idea there was such a thing as a "single occupancy" tariff.


They told me that they only move people to this (or other, lower) tariff if a water meter is requested but they subsequently find that one can't be installed. So, I have an engineer booked in for the end of the month and I should end up with either a water meter or a lower tariff than my current one.

Many thanks for the responses. I think it would be absolutely useful to know more about various situations because the responses we had here so far confirm my suspect that there is a great margin for... improvements.


I say here what is my experience. I have recently required to review my bill for the 5th or 6th time. That should be around 235 / 240? per year. The first bill TW sent me was in excess of 600?.


True that there is a "thames water's household charges scheme" updated every year under section 143 of the Water Industry Act 1991 (as amended). The tariffs should therefore be clearly set and made very comprehensible to everybody. Also terms of payments are detailed in writing.


However, what is set in the terms and conditions does not correspond to the behaviour of the company and it is very hard to predict what one's bill could be.


Two single renters of similar 1 bedroom flats can pay appallingly different bills. Why?


The first reason of paying very different bills in London and in the whole of the regions (Thames Valley) served by the company I reckon comes from the fact that in some areas they charge you only for water and in others only for wastewater whereas in many of the London Boroughs they charge you for both. But in some Outer London Boroughs - for instance Sutton is Outer London - the bills can be significantly different.


Metered / unmetered / assessed household charges are calculated theoretically in a standard way but, once again, the type of property and the number of occupiers makes a huge difference in the final bill.


Singles should pay less for sure in case there is no meter.


Another distinction is, in case you have metered water, if you receive benefits or have certain medical conditions or not: in this cases you may qualify for a scheme they call WaterSure.


But there is another scheme for help you with a reduction of 50% of your bill that is called WaterHelp and it applies either if you have or have not a meter on grounds of low income with qualifying criteria being "a gross household income (including benefits but excluding disability benefits) of less than ?16,385 or less than ?19,747 if your property is within a London Borough (the ?income threshold?)".


On top of all these variables, there are a number of "adjustments" the company can apply to your bill and various allowances such as the leakage allowance, sometimes automatically and sometimes only if you explicitly call and claim the discount or allowance.


As far as I can see the company has an aggressive way of collecting all possible moneys from all types of occupiers who live in a property, even for short term tenancies and even if you qualify for WaterHelp.


TW reserves the right to "back-bill" you if previous occupiers have not paid their bills or they think that they can raise some money all the same but they do not detail such costs in the bill.


In my case, I live in a block of flats where there are no meters: the freeholders and leaseholders of the flats are liable for water charges but I have agreed in my tenancy agreement with my direct landlord to pay water bills. TW tried at first to make me pay for past unpaid bills they have not received payments for by neither other landlords nor previous tenants. I have rejected this request. They have accepted they have to bill me applying the WaterHelp Scheme but, surprise surprise, they have decided to apply the WaterHelp scheme from the day in which they have decided I was eligible for it and not from the day in which I came to live in the property and I have been paying council tax for / that means there is a certain date from which I am liable for water costs.


So all in all I think the more people say what their bills are in public the more chances we have to pay the right tariff.

Thanks spoiled talent, that?s really useful. For those interested in pursuing, here is the link to the relevant page on Thames Water?s website https://www.thameswater.co.uk/help/account-and-billing/financial-support/waterhelp

The threshold for household income is higher than for claiming government benefits and would benefit single occupiers on a low income.


As a by the by, I wonder if the poster who is paying ?40 pm for a one bedroom flat is making 8 monthly payments per annum rather than 12 which would bring the annual bill down to ?320? Still too much though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Re Day One, £52 for a short hair cut (cut & styling) and £72 for a long hair cut (cut & styling) which I believe is below the ears.  £38 for a blow dry which doesn’t appear to be included in the cut price as it’s not mentioned.  £15 for a fringe tidy.      I remember being startled to be charged separately for a blow dry by the salon that used to be in Melbourne Grove but is now closed down.  I was asked if I wanted a blow dry after the cut and highlights and said yes, but wasn’t told that I would be charged separately.  Only found out when I went to pay the bill.    Was offered a voucher on a further appointment.    De.Salon which used to be Cut-Throat in Peckham (Choumert Rd and Brixton) charge from £45 for a Short haircut that finishes by the ears.  They charge from £40 for any haircut that finishes below the jawline.  Their prices include a blow dry.  But if you have thick hair they charge an extra £15 for every additional 15 minutes for cutting.     I had my hair cut there before the name change.  I don’t understand the from part of the price. Had a look at the Blue Tit pricing which is very complicated. They charge depending on the stylist’s  experience.  Crab Salad in Peckham  -  short hair cut above the ear - from £69.    Long hair Cut below the ear from £80. Blow dry not mentioned as being included in the cut but is priced at £55 I noticed that Kuki charge different prices for men and women.  Doesn’t seem right if a woman has short hair and a man has long hair.   I used to go to a great salon in NW London  that charged the same price for men and women and stopped going when they upped their prices for women.  
    • BIAB is supposed to be less damaging to the nails than Shellac. It stands for Builder in a Bottle. 
    • I have been training at the hub for just over one year. I really enjoy the variety of training offered and the quality of the instructors. Very effective group classes and enjoyable in the open air! A very welcoming place which makes a fitmess journey pleasant!  
    • We're are just about to get ready for sale, a 2 bed flat, very close to Peckham Rye park.  It has been rented out for sometime, so is in need of some TLC for it to look its best, before it goes on the market.  Would be interested to know others thoughts on whether its best to just have the place painted completely white throughout, probably with new grey flooring, or if it might be more appealing to add some colour/interest (nothing too drastic), perhaps something alittle 'warmer', with some nice (potentially dark) feature walls maybe? Wondered whether the days of going completely white might now have passed ..... It might be useful to know that its not a period or conversion property, but rather a flat in a private purpose built block. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...