Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I can say that the crime didn't happen on our patch because it didn't. Tne fact that a future crime may have is pure speculation.


This forum is (and always has been) very alert to present danger - when this was a 'present danger' (if it ever was) no one locally knew about it - it now isn't.


If there are any cheerleaders for paedophilia I doubt they will be posting on the forum - so we can assume that anyone who read about this (past) event will be saying, 'Nasty man, glad he's been caught'. If you want to start a 'second pint down, time to start setting the world to rights' discussion, the Lounge may be a better place for it.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> If there are any cheerleaders for paedophilia I

> doubt they will be posting on the forum



I wouldn't be so sure about that. This is exactly the sort of thread which would pique their interest. The relative anonymity of an internet forum is precisely the environment where they would feel relatively safe to (subtly and insidiously) defend their proclivities. They may not say it bluntly but there may well be people reading this thread that have such proclivities.

Not sure why so many posters are being defensive about the OPs shock on finding out someone employed at a local school is a peadophile who watches sick footage of children being raped and abused.


I would want to know who his connections are, whether he was a member if any local clubs etc where he may have had contact with local kids.


My kids don't go to Dulwich College, but the fact he chose to work in a school indicates his intention to take steps towards acting out his abuse fantasies. I can't see how this will not be of interest to people in ED.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
    • Unless you're 5 years old or have been living in a cave for several decades you can't be for real. I don't believe that you're genuinely confused by this, no one who has access to newspapers, the tv news, the internet would ask this. Either you're an infant, or have recently woken up from a coma after decades, or you're a supercilious tw*t
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...