Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I can say that the crime didn't happen on our patch because it didn't. Tne fact that a future crime may have is pure speculation.


This forum is (and always has been) very alert to present danger - when this was a 'present danger' (if it ever was) no one locally knew about it - it now isn't.


If there are any cheerleaders for paedophilia I doubt they will be posting on the forum - so we can assume that anyone who read about this (past) event will be saying, 'Nasty man, glad he's been caught'. If you want to start a 'second pint down, time to start setting the world to rights' discussion, the Lounge may be a better place for it.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> If there are any cheerleaders for paedophilia I

> doubt they will be posting on the forum



I wouldn't be so sure about that. This is exactly the sort of thread which would pique their interest. The relative anonymity of an internet forum is precisely the environment where they would feel relatively safe to (subtly and insidiously) defend their proclivities. They may not say it bluntly but there may well be people reading this thread that have such proclivities.

Not sure why so many posters are being defensive about the OPs shock on finding out someone employed at a local school is a peadophile who watches sick footage of children being raped and abused.


I would want to know who his connections are, whether he was a member if any local clubs etc where he may have had contact with local kids.


My kids don't go to Dulwich College, but the fact he chose to work in a school indicates his intention to take steps towards acting out his abuse fantasies. I can't see how this will not be of interest to people in ED.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • 100% agree and eloquently put. Trump's lawsuit will go nowhere. He can't sue in the UK as he is out of time and the bbc would have a case to countersue given all the times he has lied about the BBC. A court in Florida will have no jurisdiction in the UK and he would still have to prove malice and reputational damage. Well he won the elction so there's no argument on damage there. The program was not broadcast in the US, so very few if any people saw it. His entire speech is readily available to view elsewhere anyway. And on reputation, does he really want all the facts dragged out as you have listed them above? In what world does Trump thinks that leaves him with a good reputation that someone else could damage? It will go nowhere, like so many of his other lawsuits and court actions. The BBC should hold firm. A more curious question though is why the Telegraph waited until now to do their predictable mischief?   Agreed. To downplay the state murder of a journalist, in an embassy on foreign soil of all places, because he was 'not liked' by a lot of people, is just ludicrous and offensive. Compare that to his narrative around the murder of Charlie Kirk, who was also not liked by a lot of people. Trump is playing his guest as always, but it shows just how morally spineless he really is. 
    • He's done 34 foreign trips to 26 countries since becoming PM.  With all the in-fighting going on at #10 and with some MPs and one Labour mayor on manoeuvres,  should he not be staying at home and fighting for his premiership and the interests of the party?  or does he reckon he is already doomed and feels better away from it all?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...