Jump to content

Recommended Posts

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I do not understand why people would take their

> dog to a Pub Restaurant.

>

> Would you take your Dog to an Indian Restaurant..

> ??


Indian restaurants wouldn?t allow it, so it?s not an option.

Pub restaurants are a bit more casual.

However, I doubt Franklin?s would allow a dog - happy to be corrected.

Anyway, Spart?s text seemed to suggest there is more at play than an innocent question (though I?m too naive to discern exactly what !).

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dogs are great and loveable but don't belong in a

> pub or restaurant, unless they're a guide dog.

> Leave them at home and allow those who don't like

> them, have allergies or fears around them, to

> enjoy a neutral space freely. Bring them back a

> doggy bag!


Well said. My sentiment entirely.


One night recently in the EDT there must of been 15 + Dogs.

May well of been organised by owners who seemed to know each other.


Dogs were naturally excited and barking at each other.


Not nice.


DulwichFox

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...