Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Remember that warm sunny day we had on Tuesday? Already it seems like a distant memory. Anyway...


I visited the playground and enjoyed the warmth with my kids on Tuesday. While there, I spent a lot of time supervising random small children (aged around 18 months - 2.5) who were taking delight in running down a big slide, playing in front of moving swings and climbing into baby swings wanting pushed with no apparent adult around to help. I asked a couple of them who was looking after them, but they were too small to answer. Finally one little boy pointed to a seating area where a group of completely disengaged young women were sitting engrossed in their smart phones.


Eventually one of them dragged herself up off her backside, rounded up the kids, and declared it was time to get back to nursery.


They didnt have hi-vis vests on like I've seen before in the park, so I have no idea what nursery they were from, but from a parents view I was pretty shocked at the lack of supervision for such small kids. This was Peckham Rye Park, so I assume it was walking distance from there. Really unprofessional :-(

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/29875-nurseries-and-park-trips/
Share on other sites

Oh that's such a shame! I was recently in Ruskin Park playground and a nursery group came in - and I was so impressed by how well the carers managed the kids, and not only that but seemed to be enjoying themselves (as did the kids), they clearly had great affection for each other, and it was lovely to hear the adults calling out to the kids and vice versa. Some of the older kids were doing their own thing but not out of reach and no differently to e.g. how my 4 yr old will be more independent in the playground than I'd allow my 17mth old to be. What a shame the group you saw were at the other end of the spectrum. Wonder who it was.

You should have followed them. I saw a couple of nurseries with children in Goose Green Park on Monday; they all had hi-vis vests and the children were well cared for. The only thing I didn?t like was that the children were walking back with the carers but they were holding their hands. My child's previous nursery used to take them out in double pushchairs but I imagine it is OK to walk if the nursery is not too far.


I must admit I visited many nurseries for my second child in Dulwich and not many gave me the confident I needed it.

I do feel sorry for the children sometimes. First step montessory in Upland road was extremelly tidy in my opinion which showed they didn't give much freedom to the children; not only that but there was a lady who probably had a handover or didn't sleep well the night before and showed no interest on the children at all, apparently she was a trainee; one child went to the toilet and didn't pull his pants up and they took him out of the toilet in a not very nice way, my impression was that they were not very caring.


Mother Goose in Upland Road was fine; but the staff did need it TLC.


Mother Goose in Green Lane told me they had places available and asked me to put my money and application in the letter box and didnt even open the door; then I got an email saying I was on the waiting list for the following year or two, can't remember now.


This was a couple of years ago, hopefully they have improved now.


Children adapt easily but we realy don't know what's going on when they can't even speak properly

At the end of it all, the kids had fun, albeit supervised by other parents there at the time rather than the people paid to do it, but it wasn't a good situation at all. I have seen nursery groups at the park many times and generally it makes me smile seeing the little ones in their vests trotting along like ducklings :)


Lack of vests suggests it wasn't any of the well known nurseries in the immediate area, I've seen groups from those nurseries before and there were logos identifying where they were from. There are a couple in the parade of shops heading towards Peckham (near the Tesco, towards Rye Oak School), wonder if it could be them?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...