Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone


I received a PCN for driving in the southbound Rye Lane bus lane, just after Barclays, the other day...which I'm initially embarrassed about, it's not something I'd choose to do. Nor (before any non-drivers start jumping down my throat) do I think motorists should break the law etc...


However, I've looked on streetview, and the signage and road markings seem to fall short, on several counts, of Traffic Regulations requirements. In particular

- the warning sign is damaged, and located less than 20m (should be 30m) from the required left turn

- the required left turn has a dotted line across it, indicating that it's a junction rather than the continuation of main traffic flow

- start of the bus lane is not marked with any dotted line at all, let alone a 30m taper which is required

- text on the road itself is defaced and hard to read (looks even worse on the northbound)


I just wondered (as I was a visitor to Dulwich) if anyone might be kind enought to confirm (if it's on your way home) that the streetview images, and my description above) are still accurate? If the Council has fixed the matter, then it's my fault and I'll take my expensive grief...if not, then I'll appeal.


Would be enormously grateful. Thanks!


Richard

I see people caught there all the time - I usually notice the ones that go through, notice and reverse back. It's a strange junction if you don't know it - but it must have been challenged before - so I assumed it was legal.


They also dig up that road every month or so - street view was about a year or so ago at least mind.


The old one way system is gone now - so I'm surprised it wasn't changed then to some extent.

Why not just informally appeal, even if they refuse you can still get the 14 days to pay the reduced fine. Will take you half an hour and you've nothing to lose.


After that you can decide whether to formally appeal, if you do, ask yourself what your time is worth, as it's a long slog, and worth doing on principle only!

Thanks Toby - there are pretty rigorous requirements for the Council to penalise cars in the bus lane. My understanding is that ANY failure to provide the required signage / road markings means that PCNs are unenforceable...so if you think the Council's not on top of its game, then appeals are entirely in order.


While I'm in favour of most bus lane designs that I see around and about, it is important for Councils to do their bit to make them clear. Apart from the nit-picky legal stuff, it's just bloody dangerous if drivers have to go around peering at every single lamppost just in case there's an obscure, badly-marked bus-lane coming up...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • For a while there was an unexpected glitch in planning laws that meant phone box operators (which is obviously mostly BT, but there were others) didn't need council permission to replace call boxes with small electronic billboards, so long as you could make calls from the billboard. I *think* the one on the corner of Croxted Rd and Park Hall Rd is an example of that. So the operators weren't always in a rush to remove the call boxes even when they didn't make any money on calls. I don't know if it still works like this. https://www.local.gov.uk/about/news/lga-call-crackdown-trojan-telephone-boxes-amid-900-cent-rise-some-areas
    • It is just a witch hunt. The estate agent has taken responsibility. FFS leave the poor woman alone. ETA: And please  stop calling her Rachel. You don't call Starmer Keir.
    • As said, why are you not eating humble pie for a non-story? I expect that scores of landlords are unaware or made mistakes in this territory.  And this is not just the Chancellor but a married couple.  It feels like you and others are taking joy in demonising her. The only question would be is the house suitable for renting out?  I expect it is, and if not that is up to Southwark to take action rather than keyboard warriors.  The only surprises are the expense of licensing - surely time for a thread on "is licensing a money maker for local authorities?".  I'm being facetious.  And that the cost of rental, which feels fairly reasonable based on this area. By all means go after rogue landlords.  Be my guest.  I was horrified to see some of the properties rented in London and beyond by family members.  Not all bad. Oh and another question.  Haven't I got better things to do than comment on this 'no story here' thread?  😁
    • Week 10 fixtures...   Saturday 1st November Brighton & Hove Albion v Leeds United Burnley v Arsenal Crystal Palace v Brentford  Fulham v Wolverhampton Wanderers Nottingham Forest v Manchester United Tottenham Hotspur v Chelsea Liverpool v Aston Villa   Sunday 2nd November West Ham United v Newcastle United Manchester City v AFC Bournemouth   Monday 3rd November Sunderland v Everton
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...