Jump to content

Recommended Posts

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just pedestrianise Oxford Street if they want to

> ?reinvigorate? it. Most provincial high streets in

> England removed traffic decades ago and yet

> London?s ?premier shopping street?, is still a

> congested, polluted, mess.



I guess it would depend on where they re-routed all the buses to.


I think it's too late to reinvigorate Oxford Street. It is all becoming like the Tottenham Court Road end always was - full of tourist shops selling cheap rubbish, and huge bizarre candy shops.


And chains which just sell the same (boring) stuff you can get in their branches elsewhere.


I hope I'm wrong, but like I suspect many people I now do almost all my shopping online (the downside of that obviously being the items sent via Royal Mail which never arrive .....).


If there were more quirky independent shops, like in some other nearby areas, and more appealing places to eat, that might help, but I guess they couldn't afford the rents.

The issue with pedestrianisation of Oxford street is that currently people with limited mobility use buses and taxis to traverse it's length.

Remove vehicles and you will make it less accessible as its a long street so shoppers with mobility issues will go elsewhere.


Whilst you can argue that one or two shoppers going elsewhere isn't a big deal, they often come with family, carers or friends so the loss of shoppers increases.


On top of that many bus routes don't terminate on or near Oxford Street, but go through it to get to other destinations so they will need to be rerouted to bypass any closures.


A good example of both effects was the recent closure of Rye Lane where bus journeys took longer and businesses claim they suffered a fall in sales.


So the issue of closing to traffic isn't bad simple as it looks.

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Private Eye has covered this in-depth (apart from

> the "cops are too PC" bobbins at the end).


I haven't received a Private Eye for months. I took out a new subscription and received precisely one copy. I never received the free Christmas cards, either 🙄

Sign the Petition


https://www.change.org/p/westminster-council-save-the-marble-arch-mound


Save the Marble Arch Mound!

172 have signed. Let?s get to 200!


At 200 signatures, this petition is more likely to be featured in recommendations!


At 200 signatures, this petition is more likely to be featured in recommendations!


Alexander Bowen started this petition to Westminster Council

Constructed in May 2021, at a cost of ?6mn, the Marble Arch Mound has since become an icon to Londoners and tourists alike. The aim of this petition is to ask Westminster City Council to extend its lifespan beyond the proposed 9th of January dismantlement date. This icon of modern London and celebration of life during the Covid deconfinement period should be preserved and the many happy memories people have enjoyed on it should continue to take place. The Mound is both a piece of art and a piece of community - it must not be cut down in its prime especially in light of the money and joy already invested into it. Our message is simple - #SaveTheMound

"Leighton Giles?2 days ago

This is a wonderful example of not what to do and must serve as a remembrance to things so bad they?re good. Long live the Mound"


I agree with this and suggest the Mound should be renamed the "Vison Board Dumbshit Spending Other People's Money Memorial". The Council could have paid for dozens of social workers or teachers or environmental health offices or anything else...

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Leighton Giles?2 days ago

> This is a wonderful example of not what to do and

> must serve as a remembrance to things so bad

> they?re good. Long live the Mound"

>

> I agree with this and suggest the Mound should be

> renamed the "Vison Board Dumbshit Spending Other

> People's Money Memorial". The Council could have

> paid for dozens of social workers or teachers or

> environmental health offices or anything else...


or...if you want even more headlines to raise awareness of the folly of the mound (and save money on dissaembly)...just get four of your mates to go round with some ropes and throw it into the Thames....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Politician's moving from one party to another, especially when local is worth discussing. You have to wonder what they are driven by, and particularly in this instance, as their new party is moving in strange directions.
    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
    • Yeah  Ban people, that will solve all the planets environmental issues over night  Leave the dogs as they aren't the problem, its normally bad ownership and management that leads to badly behaved dogs. Spartacus  Ps Cat Rule 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...